Sunday, April 23, 2017


Source Article:
AUTISM WARNING: Pregnant women who take antidepressants found to have 81% higher chance of autistic children

(Natural News) Taking antidepressants before and during pregnancy may raise the odds of autism spectrum disorder in children, a recent review showed. The study found that children born to mothers who took antidepressants during pregnancy had an 81% increased odds of developing autism. The researchers also found that children born to women who took antidepressants before pregnancy had a 77% likelihood of developing autism. As part of the analysis, French researchers examined six studies with a total cohort population of 117,737 participants and compared them with people without autism.

According to the analysis, up to 15% of women experience depression during pregnancy. The researchers also noted that antidepressant-use among pregnant women around the world showed an upswing in the last few years. Women with untreated depression were at an increased risk of developing complications including diabetes and hypertension, the researchers added.

However, outside expert Carol Povey cautioned that pregnant women should not immediately stop antidepressant treatment. Povey is the current director of the National Autistic Society’s Centre for Autism. “We urge people not to jump to conclusions about this study, which brings together findings from previous research. It’s therefore vital that no-one bases any decisions about their care on these findings alone. Any mothers-to-be who are concerned about the best treatment for depression should discuss this with their doctor,” Povey said in an article in

The findings were published in the journal JAMA Pediatrics.

More studies link antidepressants to autism onset

The recent findings coincide with a number of previous studies that demonstrate a link between antidepressant treatment and autism onset. A 2015 study revealed that taking serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) during pregnancy increased the risk of autism in children. To assess this, researchers pooled data from the Quebec Pregnancy Cohort and found that SSRI intake during the second and/or third trimester of pregnancy was associated with the onset of autism in unborn children. “Some classes of antidepressants work by inhibiting serotonin (SSRIs and some other antidepressant classes), which will have a negative impact on the ability of the brain to fully develop and adapt in utero,” said lead researcher Prof. Anick Bérard in The findings were published in the journal JAMA Pediatrics.

Another study revealed that prenatal exposure to antidepressants may raise the odds of autism. To assess this, researchers at the Massachusetts General Hospital analyzed data of more than 5,400 children. The study revealed that autism spectrum disorder was more common among children born to mothers who took antidepressants during pregnancy compared with the control group. The results were published in the journal Molecular Psychiatry.

A 2013 study also found that in utero exposure to both SSRIs and non-selective monoamine reuptake inhibitors was tied to autism onset in children. However, researchers said the study did not show a causal relationship between antidepressant treatment and autism. Further studies are needed to verify the findings, the researchers wrote in BMJ.

Furthermore, a 2011 study also showed that prenatal exposure to SSRIs may lead to the development of autism in children. To carry out the study, researchers pooled data from the Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program in North Carolina. According to the study, maternal depression was linked to higher risk of autism in childrren. However, paternal depression did not appear to increase the risk.

The study also revealed that children born to mothers who took serotonin reuptake inhibitors at one year before delivery were twice as likely to develop autism. The risk of autism onset was more pronounced when the mothers took SSRIs during the first trimester of pregnancy, the researchers said. The findings were published in the Archives of General Psychiatry. (Related: Know more about other potential health risks associated with antidepressants at


For those who are ready to open their hearts and minds to just a little bit of The Truth, please watch the following videos which are, when added together, under 10 minutes.

Brother Nathanael (a Jew) on How the Holocaust Was an Exaggerated LIE

Ken O' Keefe and the truth about Adolf Hitler

Joseph Goebbels Warning - BANNED FROM YOUTUBE - National Socialism VS The Jews - Deutsche

Thursday, April 20, 2017


God bless this man for what he is doing to alert people to The Truth. Please take the 15 minutes to listen/watch this video and pray for his well-being. He is over 80 years old and they are about to put him in jail again simply for speaking The Truth. I originally found this video here but facebook is blocking my ability to share the link. The video can also be found on youtube (see below) but I am not sure how long they will leave it up. Please watch as soon as you are able and download onto your computers so you can mirror the video on your own youtube channels and so The Truth will not be lost.

Horst Mahler: final speech before fleeing the Inquisition's henchmen

UPDATE: 4-21-17
Horst Mahler has fled Germany, now seeking political asylum

Horst Mahler has fled Germany, now seeking political asylum

Wednesday, April 19, 2017


Considering that the medical system routinely tests for group B strep during pregnancy and finds that at least 10-30% of women test positive for this infection (who are then prescribed antibiotics during pregnancy), I'd say this is pretty big news.

Source Article:
Shocking study finds that penicillin changes childrens’ brains, causing them to grow up angry and violent

(Natural News) Antibiotic treatment during late pregnancy and early childhood spurred aggression and long-term behavioral changes in animal models, a recent study showed. A team of researchers at the McMaster University and St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton in Ontario, Canada examined the effects of low-dose penicillin treatment in pregnant mice and their offspring, and found that the antibiotic triggered neurochemical changes in the brain and spurred a gut bacteria imbalance in mice. These changes coincided with increased aggression and reduced anxiety in the animal models, researchers said. However, the study revealed that giving mice a lactobacillus strain of bacteria helped prevent the onset of these negative behaviors.

“In this paper, we report that low-dose penicillin taken late in pregnancy and in early life of mice offspring, changes behaviour [sic] and the balance of microbes in the gut. While these studies have been performed in mice, they point to popular increasing concerns about the long-term effects of antibiotics. Furthermore, our results suggest that a probiotic might be effective in preventing the detrimental effects of the penicillin,” said lead author Dr. John Bienenstock in an article in

The findings were published in the journal Nature Communications.

Antibiotics’ potential impact on children’s behavior

The lead author also noted that children were exposed to antibiotics during infancy, and stressed on the potential effects of early antibiotic treatments on the children’s future behavioral development. “There are almost no babies in North America that haven’t received a course of antibiotics in their first year of life. Antibiotics aren’t only prescribed, but they’re also found in meat and dairy products. If mothers are passing along the effects of these drugs to their as yet unborn children or children after birth, this raises further questions about the long-term effects of our society’s consumption of antibiotics,” Dr. Bienenstock said.

Another study has demonstrated a similar effect on animal models. Canadian researchers examined healthy mice and used antibiotics to alter their gut bacteria. According to the study, mice that received antibiotics displayed increased eagerness and less apprehension compared with those in the control group. The researchers also found that antibiotics-treated mice had higher levels of a brain protein associated with depression and anxiety compared with the controls. The findings were published in the journal Gastroenterology.

A meta-analysis published in 2014 also confirmed that using antibiotics to treat inflammation leads to a chemical imbalance in intestinal bacteria. These effects spur changes in the gut function and behavior of hosts, the review noted. The results appeared in the journal Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology.

Modern society and the vicious cycle of aggression

A vast number of studies show that certain behavioral changes such as early aggression in children could manifest well into adolescence and adulthood. An analysis by the Frances McCleland Institute in Tucson, Arizona revealed that boys were more likely than girls to engage in aggressive acts such as hitting and punching others. However, the review also showed that girls were more likely than boys to use social aggression. The study also revealed that both genders tend to use these two forms of aggression simultaneously.

Aggressive behavior in adolescence was also associated with more violent behaviors — such as sexual abuse, child abuse, domestic violence, and homicide — in adulthood, a meta-analysis revealed. A report by the U.S. Department of Justice showed that young adults ages 18 to 24 years had the highest rates of homicide. Data also showed that 7.7% of all American women suffered sexual violence, while 22% were subject to domestic abuse. The results were published in the Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. (Related: Know more about the current state of violence in the U.S. at and

A number of research, collectively known as “Bobo doll” studies, by renowned psychologist Albert Bandura demonstrate a vicious cycle of aggression that can be transmitted between parents and their children. According to Bandura’s studies, parents who exhibit aggression were more likely to have children displaying similar behaviors.


Friday, April 14, 2017


4-6-17 – Jeanice Barcelo interviews Dean Clifford, political activist working on the front lines of transforming our world by taking on “the system” and refusing to back down until the keys to our freedom are in place. Dean has dedicated his life to removing himself from the tentacles of criminal governments while helping others do the same. He has been a political prisoner in Canada for the past 3-4 years and having been recently released, he has hit the ground running. He is once again doing interviews and working with his team to prepare paperwork so that he can begin the creation of “sovereign nations” or communities outside of the jurisdiction of criminal governments. In this interview, we cover a lot of territory including discussing the fact that pregnant women are being bullied into prenatal care and all forms of medical interference during birth -- and if they don't comply, they can be threatened with losing their children. I strongly encourage people to listen. Dean is a very powerful and interesting man and is a model for the strength and integrity that are needed at this time!

For more info:

Dean Clifford – or email
Jeanice Barcelo –

Please check out Jeanice’s vision for community:

For more great videos from Birth of a New Earth, please visit Naturally Better TV:


3-31-17 – Jeanice Barcelo interviews Vicki Thorn who is on the front lines of helping women and families recover from abortion. Vicki gives us insight into the intense experiences women can have once they choose abortion and how this decision can negatively influence the outcome of future births. This is due to the trauma of abortion and the reality of traumatic repetition. We also discuss the impact of abortion on men – a topic that is rarely, if ever, addressed but is so important for us to understand. Many men feel they have no choice in whether their children are aborted, and the loss of these children causes deep grief. It’s time we face this fact.

Further into the conversation, we talk about things that can interfere with our choice of romantic partner and discuss why so many people are entering into false unions. The interference comes from things like birth control pills, the use of perfumes and colognes that contain confusing pheromones, infant circumcision (which removes the apocrine glands that produce pheromones), and more.

Other topics of import:

Promiscuity and its Effects
Artificial Reproductive Technologies
Sperm Donation and Surrogacy
Killer Sperm, Sperm Wars and Promiscuity

Websites: Vicki Thorn –,,
Jeanice Barcelo –

Also please check out my vision for community:



3-17 - This video is about infants and very young children being severely harmed by obstetricians and pediatricians. Jeanice Barcelo interviews April Boden, the mother of a vaccine injured child. April describes her journey to motherhood as one of trauma and abuse at the hands of a psychopathic obstetrician who never even bothered to make eye contact with her during labor or childbirth. Numerous unnecessary ultrasounds during pregnancy, combined with a forced induction that was halted due to a nurse’s intervention, as well as amniotomy, pitocin, and 25 failed epidural attempts, made her birthing experience absurdly traumatic both for herself and her son, Aydan. Despite being separated from her son for SIX HOURS after birth, April and Aydan were recovering successfully from birth trauma and bonding strongly. Then disaster hit. Just after Aydan had turned 1, he was given several vaccines at once and he suffered neurological and physical damage that led to autism. April describes her experience of watching the changes in her son, which include loss of speech and repeatedly walking around in circles on tippy toes when at the playground. Despite the obvious vaccine injury, the pediatrician continued to insist that Aydan was “within the normal range” and that vaccines could not possibly have caused a problem.

Please listen to this amazing mother’s story and tune in to Ty Bollinger’s new docu-series, “The Truth about Vaccines,” during which April and her son will be interviewed. You can view the series here:

April Boden: and
Jeanice Barcelo:

Also please check out my vision for community:

For more great videos from Birth of a New Earth, please visit Naturally Better TV:


3-21-17 – Jeanice Barcelo interviews Dr. Z about the various ways medical students are systematically desensitized, purposefully traumatized and ultimately brainwashed into conformity with an evil system that is the antithesis of healing. Dr. Z gives personal testimony about the traumatizing experiences he endured during medical school which include the torture of animals, being regularly exposed to noxious, brain-damaging chemicals like formaldehyde, extreme sleep deprivation, nutrition deprivation, sunlight deprivation, and much more. Dr. Z affirms that what he experienced was, in fact, a form of trauma based mind control which obviously did not fully work on him, as he was partially awake when he started medical school and has since moved into various forms of natural healing. Dr. Z is currently involved in setting up a multidisciplinary healing institute called Total Life Center. He can be reached via e-mail at

For more information about this topic, please check out my book, "Birth Trauma and the Dark Side of Modern Medicine" -


Dr. Alvin Mahoney aka Dr. Z - and

Jeanice Barcelo:

Also please check out my vision for community:

For more great videos from Birth of a New Earth, please visit Naturally Better TV:


3-15-17 - Jeanice Barcelo interviews Dr. Jennifer Daniels of Dr. Daniels graduated with honors from Harvard University and received her medical degree from the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine. After decades of experience in the field of medicine, Dr. Daniels now confirms that there is no healing to be found through modern medicine and that the medications people are being given are deadly. The medical system is now the #1 killer in the United States, causing the death at least 800,000 annually. Despite this fact, the FDA continues to hound and harass people who share truly healing remedies that have the potential to cure.

Our discussion takes us into various forms of natural healing, including the use of a plant called Kratom for extreme pain and arthritis. We also discuss vegetarian diets for relief of morning sickness and other ailments, as well as turpentine for the removal of parasites and to treat all kinds of serious ailments including autoimmune disorders and much more.

Other topics of interest during this jam-packed 50-minute show include

- the mind control of medical students
- rape culture in medical school
- birth rape
- placenta and cord blood theft
- organ theft, cannibalism and vampirism in medicine

For more information, please visit our websites:

Dr. Jennifer Daniels:
Jeanice Barcelo:

And also please check out the community I am seeking to create:

For more great videos from Birth of a New Earth, please visit Naturally Better TV:


Interview with Dr. Paul Byrne, 80+-year-old neonatalogist and whistle blower sharing information about the dark side of the medical system. Dr. Byrne exposes the fact that organs can only be harvested from LIVING people. Although we are conditioned to believe organs are harvested after people die, this is completely false and we have been deliberately deceived and misinformed.

Those who are unfortunate enough to end up unconscious in hospitals (from car accidents or drug overdoses, etc.) are in danger of being put on paralysis drugs and deliberately murdered by doctors in order that their organs be harvested. In fact, this is customary procedure, and doctors are lying to family members all the time in order to get them to consent to organ “donation” – which is nothing short of organ theft and medical murder.

Dr. Byrne talked about the bogus concepts of "brain death" and "cardiac death"-- which are complete fabrications conjured up by the medical "profession" for the purpose of legitimizing the murder of living people in order to harvest their organs.

We are dealing with SORCERY folks. And we had better get hip to it.

This information is critically important. Please give a listen and share with your friends and loved ones.

And here is a short follow-up to my interview with Dr. Paul Byrne about organ theft and medical murder. In this video, I show how the media are promoting and attempting to normalize cannibalism in the United States. I also pose the question -- could the brutal theft of human organs be happening in such HUGE numbers in the United States (and elsewhere) in order to fill the needs of Luciferian psychopaths that crave the consumption of human blood and body parts?

You make the call.

Dr. Paul Byrne:
Jeanice Barcelo website:
Jeanice Barcelo blog:

For more shows, please visit:

Please also check out my vision for the future!

Wednesday, April 12, 2017


Now, if you were an infant and everything in evolution taught you to expect that your parents would protect you and even die for you if necessary... well, what do you think would happen to your psyche if, for example, your parents allowed satanic priests (otherwise called "doctors") to strap you to a torture board and jam a sharp, pointy instrument into your penis and then rip and tear the foreskin away from the glans to which it is adhered? How would you FEEL when these psychopathic demons also decide to cut and snip at the frenulum for maximum effect, and then cut off your foreskin entirely, sometimes leaving you maimed for life with painful erections that are crooked because there is not enough skin for the penis to go full length -- and all of this is done without anesthesia? Do you think you would EVER trust your parents again or feel safe around them? Do you think you would ever trust ANYBODY again after the betrayal you experienced straight out the womb?

Let's get with program people. Please wak up. PROTECT YOUR CHILDREN FROM MEDICAL MONSTERS AND STAY AWAY FROM DOCTORS WHENEVER POSSIBLE. There is no goodness to be found in the medical system -- only mind controlled automatons doing what they're told or straight up satanists that get off on harming people. Every child born in a hospital or subjected to the brutality of "prenatal care" is at risk of extreme damage and an inability to bond with his/her parents. If we do not protect our children, we are not only condemning them to a life of suffering but also condemning our entire bloodline to mutations and alterations that can continue on for generations.

TRAUMA is the reason children are not bonding with their parents. This, and a lack of love and protection are setting the stage for disaster.

Source Article:
FOUR out of 10 babies do not form a strong enough bond with their parents - and it affects them for life!

- New Princeton University research shows the importance of parental bonding in the long-run

- Some 40 per cent of infants are living in fear or distrust of their parents because of a lack of bonding as children

- Poverty, ignorance and stress said to be the main factors preventing the bond from forming

- Researchers study basic bonding is simple to achieve and can come just from touching and sensitivity

- It gives the child a sense of security and allows them to know their needs have been met

Four out of 10 infants born in the United States do not form a strong bond with either parent, and they will pay for that the rest of their lives, a new study has found.

Research from Princeton University has shown the number of babies born into families that are poorly equipped to give them a fair chance at having a successful life is alarmingly high.

Additionally, a study from the University of Rochester showing that nearly one-third of U.S. parents don't know what to expect from their newborns, or how to help them grow and learn and get along with others.

The main problem, according to the Princeton study, is 40 percent of infants in the U.S. 'live in fear or distrust of their parents', and that will translate into aggressiveness, defiance and hyperactivity as they grow into adults.

It's bonding time: A new study says not enough parents are properly bonding with their babies, which creates greater problems later in life. However researchers say basic bonding is simple

Of that number, 25 percent don't bond with their parents because the parents aren't responding to their needs.

Some 15 percent find their parents so distressing that they will avoid them whenever possible.

'They can overcome it,' sociologist Sophie Moullin of Princeton, lead author of that study, told ABC News.

'It's not a make or break situation, but they might find it harder to regulate their behavior.'

Moullin, along with coauthors from Columbia University and the University of Bristol in England, analyzed more than 100 research projects, including data collected by a U.S. longitudinal study of 14,000 children born in 2001, to reach their conclusions.

While many factors contribute to the problem - including poverty, ignorance, and stress - critical bonding is simple to achieve, researchers say.

'When a parent, most of the time, responds to a child in a warm, sensitive and responsive way - picking up the child when they cry, and holding and reassuring them - the child feels secure that they can meet their needs,' the study notes.

Other research shows that simply touching, or caressing, a newborn is critical to the infant's sense of security.

The study also says that the bond can be with either parent, not necessarily both, but studies of childhood crime and risky behavior contend that for boys, the bond is more important with the father, and for girls, the bond is relatively more important with the mother.

Mother's touch: Researcher's say that little things like sensitivity when picking up a crying child and even a soft touch makes the child feel secure

Nearly all of these studies are based on observation of children over an extended period of time.

Researchers usually pay more attention to the child than the parent, because the lack of a bond is more apparent in the infant.

One innovative technique is called the 'strange situation'.

The parent leaves the baby with a caregiver for about 20 minutes, and then either the parent or a stranger reenters the room.

The reaction to the returning parent, compared to the arrival of a stranger, tells volumes about the relationship between parent and child.

If a failed relationship is detected, especially when the infant is six months old or younger, the chances of helping the parent and the child form a strong bond is greatly improved, the study notes.

The fact that damage can begin that young should be sobering to parents.

However, often the parents most in need of help are the least likely to seek it.

Moullin said researchers in one study had observed 2-year-olds over several months and were able to predict which ones would have the most trouble years later in school, based on the child's level of poverty.

The bond can be with either parent, but studies of childhood crime and risky behavior contend that the bond is more important with the father for boys, and for girls, the bond is relatively more important with the mother

Usually, it's the mother who is the central focus of studies like these, probably because the mom is the main caregiver, especially in the early years.

But a study at the University of Iowa two years ago concluded that 'being attached to dad is just as helpful as being close to mom'.

That is critical during the first two years of life.

A similar study in 2012 from the Imperial College London found that fathers were especially important in helping the infant avoid behavioral problems later in life.

If the father is remote or distracted, the child is more likely to be aggressive.

This is a problem that is not going to go away, and some percentage of parents will never be able to do a decent job because of a wide variety of reasons.

But what all these studies show is the importance of those first few months of life, when a tiny baby is sent on a trajectory that will partly determine success at something as simple - and as critical - as getting along with others.

Monday, April 10, 2017


Excellent article at Activist Post that is no longer available but can still be found at It is amazing that they removed this article as it does not even mention that the medical system is totally controlled by Luciferian Jews and their "medicine" is Jewish sorcery.

Still, it's a great article and worth sharing. Enjoy.

Has Drug-Driven Medicine Become A Form of Human Sacrifice?

i>Unless we put medical freedom into the Constitution the time will come when medicine will organize itself into an undercover dictatorship. To restrict the art of healing to doctors and deny equal privileges to others will constitute the Bastille of medical science. All such laws are un-American and despotic. -- Attributed to Dr. Benjamin Rush, Signer of the Declaration of Independence

Sayer Ji
Activist Post

Benjamin Rush accurately foretold a grave possibility facing Americans today: namely, that the art and science of healing should be restricted to a select class of allopathic physicians, who have the sole legal right to recommend and administer medicines, and whose pharmacopeia excludes – as a matter of principle – all the healing foods, vitamins and herbs which have been used safely and effectively for countless millennia in the prevention and treatment of disease.

We have entered an era where medicine no longer bears any resemblance to the art and science of healing. The doctor no longer facilitates the body’s innate self-healing capabilities with time, care, good nutrition and special help from our plant allies. To the contrary, medicine has transmogrified into a business enterprise founded on the inherently nihilistic principles of pure, unbridled crony capitalism.

Turning Disease Into Gold

Many modern diseases are, in fact, created by fiat (not unlike modern currencies): age-old symptoms of nutritional deficiency or chemical poisoning are repackaged and renamed in Latin and Greek as would-be monolithic disease entities, and subsequently rolled out to the consumer as new markets; each disease representing a veritable gold mine of "treatable" symptoms; each symptom providing justification for the prescription of a new set of patented, toxic drug-commodities.

The "medicines" themselves are often devoid of intrinsic value, being nothing more than rebranded and re-purposed chemicals, intended (though all too often failing) to be administered in sub-lethal concentrations. Indeed, many of these chemicals are too toxic to be legally released into the environment, much less be administered intentionally to a human who is already sick.

You need look no further than a typical drug package insert to find proof that the side effects of most drugs far outnumber their purported beneficial effects. These chemicals are so highly leveraged against their true value, that they often sell for as much as 500,000% percent from cost! Only medical/pharmaceutical and financial institutions (e.g. Federal Reserve) are legally empowered to generate the illusion that they are creating something of value out of nothing of value, on this scale.

This manipulation of perceived value, which is the basis for the global dominance of the drug-based medical model, is not unlike how financial institutions create toxic derivative products, essentially creating the illusion of financial well being and prosperity, at the very moment that they are planting the seeds of death within the global economy; ruining the lives of countless millions in the process.

The Undercover Medical Dictatorship

Within the present dominant medical system, healing has not simply been forgotten, but intentionally exorcized, as it represents the antithesis of perpetual profitability which requires the incurability of the human body. Were the truth to be told, and the body’s self-regenerative capabilities acknowledged, the entire superstructure of drug-based medicine and hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue it generates annually, would crumble overnight.

When a handful of turmeric has more chemotherapeutic activity than any drug yet to receive FDA approval, or an enzyme from pineapple is superior to a 40-year-old blockbuster chemotoxic agent, one begins to understand why the hundreds of studies proving natural substances can destroy cancer are never discussed. You can’t compete with free, effective and safe in a medical marketplace dominated by expensive, ineffective and unsafe.

If this degeneration into quackery and snake-oil salesmanship, which is modern drug-driven medicine, were simply a lesson in what bad things can happen when health care is no longer a basic human right but strictly a profit-driven commodity, perhaps Americans could find it within themselves to once again free themselves from the shackles of oppression. After all, do we not consider ourselves the very originators of freedom, independence and democracy? Have we not such great faith in these principles that we practically trip all over ourselves (crushing entire countries as we fall) in our Promethean effort to export these values overseas whether we are invited to do so or not? Would we stand for less when it comes to our own health freedom?

Sadly, the “undercover dictatorship” Benjamin Rush foretold is not simply a homegrown one we can root out from the inside, as it were. Although the American Medical Association (AMA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) behave as if they are at the top of this pyramid of power relations, they serve far lower in the hierarchy. While the United States government and American corporate lobbying groups may appear to be behind the FDA’s shameless pandering to the interests of the drug companies, transnational corporations and organizations -- and the few steering them -- are in fact pulling the strings. The United States no longer enjoys global economic and cultural hegemony. We are now embedded in an international playing field where multinational and transnational organizations like the drug company Pfizer, or the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) have power and influence that overshadows the US or any other particular government or nation-state.

These larger organizations blur the divisions traditionally drawn between public and private institutions, insofar as their agendas and mandates are consistent with global economic imperatives that do not account for the self-proclaimed sovereignty of any particular nation-state’s Constitution or laws above its own.

For example, the United States may soon no longer be able to allow the over-the-counter sale of dietary supplements if the World Trade Organization decides it violates our membership agreement to do so. (This process known as Codex Alimentarius is already quite far enough along, with prescription-only vitamins already making it onto the market, and herbs like ephedra (and cannabis long before it) having been classified as illegal drugs.

Pharmageddon: The Death of Natural Medicine

At the end of times the merchants of the world will deceive the nations through their Pharmacia.
(sorcery) - Rev 18:23

Given this unseemly state of affairs, some believe we are on the precipice of a medical end-of-times or “Pharmageddon," if you will, where medicine is no longer directly associated in any way with healing, but rather is a form of mass control and a highly organized means of simultaneously defrauding the public of its wealth and health.

After all, is there any greater absurdity than a medical model that treats the symptoms of disease with sub-lethal dosages of toxic chemicals and in which there is no attempt to uncover, understand or remove the causes of those imbalances?

After all, what disease has ever been found to be caused by a lack of a drug?

Is acid reflux caused by a lack of proton-pump inhibitors?

Is heart disease caused by a lack of statin drugs?

Is osteoporosis caused by a lack of Fosamax?

Is cancer caused by a lack of chemotherapy?

Is depression caused by a lack of Paxil?

Absolutely not!

Then why would anyone consider it sound practice to use potentially toxic chemicals as a first-line treatment for conditions that are not caused by a lack of a chemical? To the contrary many diseases are caused exactly by culminative exposure to toxic chemicals that not unlike drugs are biologically alien to the body. We are treating poisoning with poisons!

Can we dignify this approach by calling it medicine? Or, is it more accurately described as a form of sorcery?

Pharmaceuticals and Human Sacrifice

The sole reliance on Pharmaceuticals reveals quite a lot about the agenda underpinning modern medical practice. The Greek word Pharmakon has the following meanings: “drug, poison, potion, charm, spell, enchantment." But the origin of the word goes back much farther:

A Pharmakós (Greek: φαρμακός) in Ancient Greek religion was a kind of human scapegoat (a slave, a cripple or a criminal) who was chosen and expelled from the community at times of disaster (famine, invasion or plague) or at times of calendrical crisis, when purification was needed. [Source: Wikipedia]

The sacrificial dimension of the Pharmakós carries on in the nostrums and potions later named after this ritualistic object:

The term "pharmakos" later became the term "pharmakeus" which refers to "a drug, spell-giving potion, druggist, poisoner, by extension a magician or a sorcerer." A variation of this term is "pharmakon" (φάρμακον) a complex term meaning sacrament, remedy, poison, talisman, cosmetic, perfume or intoxicant. From this, the modern term "pharmacology" emerged.[Source: Wikipedia]

One no longer has to look to religion for the absolutist claim to truth. Medical science has laid claim to the body in the same way that religions once laid claim to the soul. The physician today -- albeit a glorified "applied pharmacologist" -- has become the "priest of the body," capable of influencing the course of life or death by the quality, or combinations, of nostrums (s)he is able to apply to the problem (i.e. patient) at hand.

Just as monotheism depends on there being "one God," modern medical science depends on the "evidence-based" concept that there is one truth, and one right way to apply it. This, by implication, gives absolute power to those who would claim to know the difference.

Liberation Through Natural Medicine

In Benjamin Rush’s time. the medical dictatorship of which he spoke had not yet come to pass; and though magical potions like mercury and questionable techniques like bloodletting were used in colonial times, herbs were still considered and employed as legitimate medicines. Even if many wise women herbalists were eliminated as competition by being branded witches and sometimes murdered, the herbs themselves were not categorically demonized because no vast armory of pharmaceutical drugs had yet been created to supplant them.

The herbs and foods themselves have now been both vilified as dangerous, and lampooned as completely ineffectual, generating the ridiculous contradiction that we are supposed to be dumb enough to accept as truth: namely, that they are both impotent and unsafe.

Given these circumstances, confidence in the safety and efficacy of natural substances in the prevention and treatment of disease has not only waned, but the positive association between food and healing has been outright denied by medical authorities. It is illegal for non-doctors to make health claims for natural substances even if thousands of years of use in folk medicine and a vast emerging body of scientific research now confirms their benefits. You can’t say cherries cure gout even if it is true. (Truth is no longer the criteria that decides what you can or cannot say; rather, it's who profits more from the information being freely disseminated or censored).

I started the website in August 2008 in order to provide free and convenient access to the massive amounts of research that have accumulated on the health benefits of natural substances over the past 50 years. The government database known as Medline (which is freely searchable) contains over 18 million biomedical citations from over 5,000 scientific journals, many of which focus specifically on the therapeutic action of foods, vitamins and spices on serious, even life-threatening disease.

I believe that it is only through the free, uncensored and democratic dissemination of health information that we can secure our health freedom; and through speaking truth to power, expose the fraud which is strictly profit-driven pharmaceutical-based medicine.

Feel free to explore the 19000 + biomedical citations posted on that vindicate the safety and efficacy of natural substances in the prevention and treatment of disease.


Source Article:
Autism Symptoms in Pets Rise as Pet Vaccination Rates Rise

- Research is underway to evaluate reports of autism-like disorders observed in dogs.

- Canine autism shares many of the same characteristics as Autism Spectrum Disorders in children.

- Many of the same behavioral characteristics of autism in pets are also associated with adverse reactions to vaccines.

Just as the incidence of Autism-Spectrum Disorders (ASDs) has risen alarmingly in children over the last half century, there is evidence that similar behavioral disorders have been observed in pets, most widely reported among pet dogs. It is too early for mainstream veterinary authorities to confidently confirm that dogs can develop autism, but there are numerous reports of behavior patterns in pets that mirror autism behavior in children. Studies are underway to evaluate the possibility that animals can become autistic.1

Autistic Behaviors Recognized in Dogs

Though the appearance of autism-like behaviors has been observed in dogs since the mid 1960s, the first researcher to specifically relate some of those behaviors to autism was Nicholas Dodman, DVM, who initially set out in 2011 to look for a genetic cause of obsessive tail chasing in bull terriers. This behavioral characteristic has been observed in as many as 85 per cent of a bull terrier litter and often results in self-maiming.

Presenting the evidence from his study at the 2015 American College of Veterinary Behaviorists, Dr. Dodman reported an autism-like condition, noting that “the vast majority of affected dogs were males, and many had other strange behaviors or physical conditions that accompanied the tail chasing, such as explosive aggression, partial seizures, phobias, skin conditions, gastrointestinal issues, object fixation and a tendency to shy away from people and other dogs.”2 He and his associates were further able to establish that two biomarkers common to children with autism were also present in the affected dogs.3

Referencing diagnostic criteria from the American Academy of Pediatrics, some of the most commonly recognized features of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) in children include challenges associated with social interactions and communication, and “restrictive and repetitive interests and activities;”4 boys are five times more likely than girls to have ASDs; and autism in humans also is frequently associated with aggression, gastrointestinal and skin disorders, and object fixation.5 6

Solid research is lacking in the field of canine autism, but a collaborative study called “Canines, Kids and Autism: Decoding Obsessive Behaviors in Canines and Autism in Children” is currently underway in hopes of shedding light on the condition as it occurs in children and pets.7 Funded by The American Humane Association, researchers from the Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen), Southwest Autism Research & Resource Center, Tufts University Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, and the University of Massachusetts Medical School are hoping to develop a genetic test for autism that will benefit both humans and animals.8

“Canine Dysfunctional Behavior” May Be Autism

Though most animal behaviorists still prefer to categorize animals with these traits as having “canine dysfunctional behavior” rather than “autism,”9 those who concede the condition may in fact be autism describe the condition as both “idiopathic,” meaning the cause is unknown, and congenital,” meaning the puppies are born with autism behaviors rather than developing autism sometime after birth. Theorizing that the syndrome may be caused by a “lack of mirroring neurons in the brain,” studies also suggest that autism may appear in puppies as a result of parental exposure to toxins or unnecessary vaccines.10

Adverse Reactions to Vaccines in Dogs

From paralysis to seizures, and from immune-mediated hemolytic anemia to injection-site fibrosarcomas, adverse reactions to vaccination are not uncommon in pets. Often attributable to annual vaccinations that some veterinarians consider totally unnecessary, vaccine reactions also may lead to allergies, skin problems, behavioral changes, and autoimmune diseases.11

Behavioral Changes Following Vaccination

Some of the most common behavioral changes are associated with the rabies vaccine, which is the only vaccine federally mandated for pets and must be re-administered at least every three years if not annually, depending on how the vaccine is labeled. Usually the two vaccines are identical, but a vaccine labeled for one year must be given annually, even if it is exactly the same dosage and formulation as one labeled as a three-year vaccine.12

Many veterinarians now agree that, as a general rule, dogs who have been vaccinated once tend to retain immunity for the rest of their lives, as can be confirmed through titer testing,13. However, no such testing is considered acceptable proof for opting out of the required rabies vaccine,14 so the immune systems of pets are artificially manipulated with the rabies vaccine time and again throughout their lives.

Reported changes following rabies vaccination may include those that mimic early symptoms of rabies itself such as increased aggression toward humans and other pets, loss of affectionate behaviors, excessive barking, and destructiveness.15 Such behavioral changes are often attributed to “Rabies Miasm,” a term used to describe an underlying disease process, in this case a condition akin to a mild form of “chronic rabies.”16

Could There Be Another Explanation?

Interestingly, many of those same “rabies-like symptoms” also mimic the ones described in discussions of canine autism.

Globally, the animal vaccine industry has been valued at $6.27 billion in 2015 and, at a calculated annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.9 per cent, it is expected to rise to $11.40 billion by 2024.17 North America and, particularly, the United States remains the lead market for animal vaccines, accounting for 37 percent of the total. Much of that market is fueled by the human companion (pet) animal segment. There are more pets in the U.S. than anywhere else in the world and, coupled with strict regulations on vaccination of companion animals in this country, the pet vaccine market is not expected to decrease.

Given the current laws requiring annual or three-year repeat rabies vaccinations, and the routine veterinary practice of vaccinating pets annually, it may come as no surprise that we are seeing an increase of autoimmune disorders and autism-like behaviors in pets.

Thursday, March 30, 2017


Dear friends - Today is the launch of a new documentary series by Ty Bollinger called "THE TRUTH ABOUT VACCINES." This series is destined to awaken millions of people to what is really going on in the sordid world of vaccination. Ty and his team are the same people that brought us the amazing docu-series called "The Truth About Cancer." Based on the incredible information that was shared in that series, I imagine this next one is going to be even more outstanding. Click on this link to sign up for your FREE viewing of what I am sure will provide you with very potent information about vaccines. BE EMPOWERED WITH FACTS TO MAKE WISE CHOICES FOR YOU AND YOUR CHILDREN.

Register for your free viewing here:

Also please check out my latest television show with April Boden, mother a vaccine-injured child. April will be interviewed in Ty's new series about vaccines.


3-17 - This video is about infants and very young children being severely harmed by obstetricians and pediatricians. Jeanice Barcelo interviews April Boden, the mother of a vaccine injured child. April describes her journey to motherhood as one of trauma and abuse at the hands of a psychopathic obstetrician who never even bothered to make eye contact with her during labor or childbirth. Numerous unnecessary ultrasounds during pregnancy, combined with a forced induction that was halted due to a nurse’s intervention, as well as amniotomy, pitocin, and 25 failed epidural attempts, made her birthing experience absurdly traumatic both for herself and her son, Aydan. Despite being separated from her son for SIX HOURS after birth, April and Aydan were recovering successfully from birth trauma and bonding strongly. Then disaster hit. Just after Aydan had turned 1, he was given several vaccines at once and he suffered neurological and physical damage that led to autism. April describes her experience of watching the changes in her son, which include loss of speech and repeatedly walking around in circles on tippy toes when at the playground. Despite the obvious vaccine injury, the pediatrician continued to insist that Aydan was “within the normal range” and that vaccines could not possibly have caused a problem.

Please listen to this amazing mother’s story and tune in to Ty Bollinger’s new docu-series, “The Truth about Vaccines,” during which April and her son will be interviewed. You can view the series here:

April Boden: and

Jeanice Barcelo:

Also please check out my vision for community:

For more great videos from Birth of a New Earth, please visit Naturally Better TV:


Source Article:
ER Nurse Shares Experiences With Vaccine Reactions

“As an E.R. nurse, I have seen the cover up. Where do you think kids go when they have a vaccine reaction?

They go to the E.R.

They come to me.

Sometimes it seemed like it was one or two cases in a single shift, every shift, for weeks. Then I would get a lull, and I wouldn’t catch one for a week or two, then I’d catch another case per night for a couple weeks. This was common.

Once, I was training a nursing student, about to graduate, on their E.R. experience rotation in nursing school. This student and I floated up to triage to cover the triage nurse for a break. I was quizzing them on what to ask and look for as a triage nurse on pediatric kids that came through. I made a point about asking about immunizations right out the gates. The student was puzzled, and asked why, and I told the student because we see vaccine reactions every day and it’s their job to catch it, alert the doctor and the parents, and report it to VAERS [Vaccine Adverse Effects Reporting System: ].

Some higher power apparently smiled on my attempt to open the eyes of another nurse I guess, because not even ten minutes later, a woman brought her child up to the counter. Sudden onset super high fever and lethargy. I asked if the child was up to date on vaccination.

I glanced at the student, who looked shocked and looked back at me in disbelief. I nodded, told them to remember this, and then took the mom and her child to finish the triage in back. When I was done I came back and sat down with the student, and asked what he learned that night so far.

The first response: “What I was told about vaccines wasn’t true”.

I couldn’t have said it better. That student is going to go on to be like me, advocating for his patients with his eyes wide open.

The cases almost always presented similarly, and often no one else connected it. The child comes in with either a fever approaching 105, or seizures, or lethargy/can’t wake up, or sudden overwhelming sickness, screaming that won’t stop, spasms, GI inclusion, etc.

And one of the first questions I would ask as triage nurse, was, are they current on their vaccinations? It’s a safe question that nobody sees coming, and nobody understands the true impact of. Parents (and co-workers) usually just think I’m trying to rule out the vaccine preventable diseases, when in fact, I am looking to see how recently they were vaccinated to determine if this is a vaccine reaction.

Too often I heard a parent say something akin to “Yes they are current, the pediatrician caught up their vaccines this morning during their check up, and the pediatrician said they were in perfect health!”

If I had a dollar for every time I’d heard that, I could fly to Europe for free.

But here’s the more disturbing part.

Mind you, I have served in multiple hospitals across multiple states, alongside probably well over a hundred doctors and probably 300-400+ nurses.

I’ve worked in big hospitals (San Francisco Bay Area Metro 40 bed ER, Las Vegas NV Metro 44 bed ER) and small hospitals (Rural access 2 bed ER, remote community 4 bed ER) and everything in between.

I have even made a point of sitting in the most prominent spot at the nurses station filling out a VAERS report to make sure as many people saw me doing it as possible to generate the expected “what are you doing” responses to get that dialog going with people.

And in every case, if a nurse approached me, their response was “I’ve never done that” or “I didn’t know we could do that” or, worse “What is VAERS?” which was actually the most common response.

The response from doctors? Silence. Absolute total refusal to engage in discussion or to even acknowledge what I was doing or what VAERS was.

The big take away from that?

The number one place parents bring their kids in the event of a vaccine reaction is the E.R., and as an E.R. staffer, I have NEVER met anyone who filed one, in spite of seeing hundreds of cases of obvious vaccine associated harm come through.

What does that say about reported numbers?

The CDC/HHS admits that VAERS is under-reported, and probably only representative of 1/10th the actual number of injuries. I contest that, and from personal experience, I would say the numbers in VAERS are more like 1/1000th the actual numbers, not 1/10th.

And the final part of that, is that I have, first hand, seen blatant cover ups from doctors. I have seen falsification of medical records and documentation via intentional omission.

I have challenged doctors who refused to put in the chart that the child was vaccinated 4 hours ago and was in perfect health, and now suddenly they are non-responsive, seizing, febrile at 105, and that labs, LP, and imaging confirms cerebral edema/encephalitis.

I ask the doctor if they will file a VAERS report, and they argue that this has nothing to do with it, its purely coincidental, and nothing should be filed, they are safe and effective.

I remind them that VAERS is a reporting body for ANY symptoms that are contemporaneous to vaccination, whether causation is believed to be associated or not, and I get the dismissal that they are not filing it because it has nothing to do with it.

No one brings it up to the parents.

It’s this giant rug-sweep that happens, and any mention of the vaccination is systematically removed or withheld from the record.

A perfect example of this was an ambulance crew that came in with a pass-off report that included the fact the child had been vaccinated only hours prior to onset of symptoms. The physician made sure this pass-off sheet disappeared mysteriously and could not get filed with the patient medical record.

So yes, I have seen the vaccine damage cover up first hand. I know that it is intentional and active in the medical community. I know that it is happening.

And on top of total denial of any association, and total cover up, they also refuse to report to VAERS which is supposed to be reported to for ANYTHING that is even in NO WAY SUSPECTED to be associated with the vaccine. This is a systemic suppression of information and statistics.

And yes, in the cases described above, I did approach the parents, and I did tell them about VAERS, and I did start a case for them and file a report. I did force the issue through my charting, although it will most likely be buried and overlooked.

I have experienced the corruption and suppression of the truth in the medical community about vaccines first hand from the provider perspective. It does happen. Every day.

I am neither pro-vax or anti-vax. I am an informed consent person.

I believe that you should be aware that, for whatever reason, some seemingly random smaller subset of the population IS in fact susceptible to these horrific adverse reactions that can be life-long debilitating in nature.

Yes the numbers are low. Yes I saw A LOT of cases, but I worked in BUSY very LARGE POPULATION areas. The nasty reactions are, in my opinion, probably down around the 0.5% chance range on the average vaccinations. The exception being Gardasil, that thing is horrible in my opinion and seems to have serious adverse reactions rates, I would guess maybe as high as 5 to 7% across the series. But that’s another subject in itself.

I wish I could tell what would make a child likely to be that 0.5% so I could see that trait and tell that parent to really consider it heavily, but I can’t. No one can. It truly seems random. Sometimes its a fragile sickly weak kid, and that makes sense that they would have a significantly higher risk of a serious adverse event. But sometimes its a perfectly healthy full term strong infant with no morbidities.

Although the boys do tend to get the reactions more often. Probably 2/3 of the serious reactions I’ve seen were boys.

But the truth is, you can’t tell by looking. Either at the kid, or their health history, or their family history. It comes down to chance. For some reason, every now and then, a child is just more susceptible to those injections than everyone else is.

Do I believe in vaccinations? For the most part. I believe that often times, the concept is good. I take issue with the use of adjuvants in the way they are currently used, and with how the FDA is suppressing additional adjuvants that have been tested successfully with fewer adverse reactions and better immune responsiveness going back decades.

But I can’t change that.

I think that they do work, kind of.

I have read about the way it can shift how the immune system functions. Shifting humoral and intracellular responsiveness so one is over-reactive and the other underreactive so the vaccine literally can make you more susceptible to certain illnesses (again, other adjuvants have mostly fixed this, but they have still not been approved 15 years later).

I have seen where the vaccine actually gave the subject the illness it was designed to prevent. (I am talking controlled studies. For an example, look at the Canadian Institute of Health ferret swine flu study).

I have seen people come in to my E.R. with the mumps in spite of being fully vaccinated against the mumps.

Same with chickenpox.

And whooping cough.

And on and on.

I have also seen the manufacturers engaged in fraud (see the federal case U.S. and two virologists vs Merck, regarding blatant fraud in MMR and forced cover-up) or the pharmaceutical industry intentionally giving people illnesses that will knowingly kill them just to turn a profit (see New York Times uncovering internal Bayer pharmaceuticals memos on their HIV-tainted hemophiliac medication where they continued to sell it AFTER they discovered they were giving people HIV by selling it, and then, when ordered to stop sales by a court in the US, they continued to sell it overseas).

But, I do acknowledge that, for the lucky few, these things do work. Although the numbers are hardly stellar, they do tend to grant some kind of protection in the majority of individuals. So yay. Yes, I do believe there is something to them.

But the truth is somewhere in the middle of the road. Not as bad as they are made out to be, but far less effective and nowhere near as safe as they would have you believe either.

In an industry that is rocked on a monthly basis by horrible medication scandals, if you didn’t question everything they told you, I would look at you funny. And it’s my job to give these medications to people.

Just to note, on a recent scandal, I have been warning people about Zofran use in pregnancy for 5 years. The information was right there in the insert. It was right there on the manufacturing website. It was right there in the PDR. As well as on every downloadable app and printed IV drug book.

The information is there.

It is the medical professionals that are failing the general public.

Now suddenly it’s all over the news, there are commercials about it, and everyone is running around in hospitals acting like they had no clue. No, we knew. We all knew. We just didn’t hold the line.

This comes back to informed consent.

As I said, I’m for informed consent. Absolutely everything we do has risks. Absolutely every medication we use has risks.

You can take Advil and have your skin scarify and blister and peel away from third degree burns originating below the surface of your skin. Is it common? Heck no. It’s darn right rare as heck. But is it possible? You betcha. And we know it.

How many nurses and doctors have told you that one?

Same goes for Benadryl.

And Tylenol studies have been shown to do liver damage at any dose in children. Any.

How many nurses and doctors have told you that?

And if you have to be lucky enough to get one that isn’t lying to you, they are probably simply ignorant of the truth and never read the insert or the PDR or the warnings on the manufacturers website.

That covers about 99.9% of everyone in healthcare. Well, allopathic health care anyway.

Now talk with another E.R. nurse. Are we saying the same things? No. Why? Because I have read more on the subject, because I have a strong sense of ethical and moral obligation to my patients, and because I will not simply take an order and follow it, even if it costs me my job. That is unusual.

You have to remember, pushing drugs makes hospitals money. Challenging doctors is a good way to make your work life suck, and bring down wrath of the administrators on you.

While that CT scan may not be the best thing for you, or warranted, or necessary by any yardstick, it will make the hospital several thousand dollars, imagine what happens to the easily replaceable nurse that stands in the way of it.


The truth is that this is what it boils down to. Call me jaded. I am. I’m fine with that. I am the salty old dog in the trenches. I have earned my battle scars in the E.R., and I have a reputation that precedes me.

I have taken every award from every hospital I have gone to, including awards, honors, and recognitions that were previously only ever given out to Social Workers and Doctors. It gives me a certain level of immunity from persecution, and that gives me the ability to speak the truth, even if it costs the hospital money. Because I’m too valuable as a P.R. piece.

So you want the truth from the inside? There you have it, from probably one of only a handful of people you are ever going to hear it from.

I can’t predict why some kids are susceptible and others aren’t. I don’t know why it is this why. I wish I did. No one does in this field.

It is actively covered up. It is known. This is real. Vaccines do help. They do have risks. As a parent, you have to make that choice on your own and live with it.

But think about this hypothetical situation. You come in and see me and ask me to vaccinate your child, I hand you a stack of papers an inch thick and tell you to start reading, and in in twenty minutes I’ll be back with 100 sided dice (yes, they make them, from the role playing game days of dungeons and dragons).

It’s a simplification, but it is a profound one that makes the situation real. I’ll hand that 100-sided dice to you and tell you to roll it.

If it comes up on number 1, your child is going to have a seizure and possibly suffer potential neurological harm, but if it comes up on any of the other 99 numbers, your child is fine.

If you can take the dice in hand and own that potential outcome, then I will inject your child. But you have to KNOW and ACCEPT the risks before I am going to do it.

I really just believe in standing up for my patients. I don’t know what happened to this industry, but, it is supposed to be the nurses job to stand between the patient and the system, to protect them from the system.

I guess I’m getting fed up with nurses and doctors just “going along” to get along. There is no big secret to any of this. I read the journals of infectious diseases, toxicology, pediatrics, emergency medicine, BMJ, Lancet, etc., and I research on PubMed through the NIH.

Everything I’m saying is public domain knowledge.

It’s stuff we SHOULD be telling you.

I am sorry we are not.

I try to take a stand where I can, but at the end of the day, I’m only one nurse.”



Highly commended and credentialed EMT and Nurse with 6 years emergency department experience across multiple hospitals and former police officer"

Tuesday, March 28, 2017


Source Article:
Toxic hairsprays found to cause penile birth defects in boys

(Natural News) Chemical-laden hairsprays prove detrimental to the reproductive health of male infants, according to a new study. Researchers at the Amiens University Hospital in France found that exposure to hair chemicals during early pregnancy may elevate the risk of a genital defect called hypospadias in male infants by up to 80%. In contract, no correlation was seen with exposure to other industrial chemicals such as paint, gasoline, ink, solvents and other household products.

“This is the first study to demonstrate a link between maternal household exposure to these two hair cosmetics during early pregnancy and the incidence of hypospadias. The precautionary principle should apply to pregnant women and they should be advised to limit their use of hair cosmetic,” the researchers wrote in the International Journal Of Environmental Research And Public Health

Researchers said the endocrine-disrupting chemicals found in hairsprays and coloring shampoos could negatively affect the development of genitalia in fetus during the early stages of pregnancy. Renowned urologist Paul Anderson said the causes of hypospadias remain unknown, but hormones may play a key role in the development of the birth defect. “At a very early stage in the pregnancy, the urethra is flat but at a critical point in development, it becomes a tube. If the hormonal mix in the womb is not right, that development may not happen or may be abnormal,” said Anderson.

The findings coincide with a 2008 study published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives. Researchers at the Imperial College London examined 471 women who gave birth to male infants with hypospadias and a similar number of women with healthier babies, and found that more than twice as many women in the hypospadias group were exposed to hairsprays throughout their job compared with unaffected controls.

Data also revealed that women who were exposed to hairspray in their workplace during the first trimester of pregnancy had a two to threefold increased odd of delivering baby with hypospadias. However, researchers found that taking folic acid supplements during pregnancy may help mitigate the risk of hypospadias onset by up to 36 percent.

Hypospadias fast facts

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), hypospadias is a genital condition where the opening of uretha is not located at the tip of the penis. The abnormal uretha development takes place during weeks eight to 14 of pregnancy. Hypospadias is classified into three categories, depending on the location of the urethra: subcoronal, midshaft and penoscrotal. Subcoronal hypospadias is characterized by the urethra opening being located somewhere near the head of the penis. On the other hand, midshaft hypospadias occurs when the urethra is located along the shaft of the penis. Penoscrotal hypospadias occurs when the urethra is found where the scrotum and the penis meet.

Risk factors associated with the onset of hypospadias in male infants include the mother’s age and weight, fertility therapies, and certain hormones.

CDC data also showed that about five in every 1,000 male infants born in the U.S. have hypospadias, which makes it one of the most common birth defects in infants. Hypospadias treatment depends of the type seen in patients. Most cases require corrective surgery. Surgeries done on male infants happen when they are between three to 18 months old. These procedures are done in a series of stages to correct the defect, such as placing the urethra to its right position, correcting the curve of the penis, and repairing the skin around the urethra’s opening.

Hypospadias was also associated with undescended testes and fertility problems in men.



Israel is the world's greatest enemy. It is a satanic nation bent on the destruction of life.

Source Article:
Journalist Accuses Israel of Fukushima Sabotage

By Richard Walker

A leading Japanese journalist recently made two incredible claims about the Fukushima power plant that suffered a nuclear meltdown in March 2011, sending shockwaves around the world. First, the former editor of a national newspaper in Japan says the U.S. and Israel knew Fukushima had weapons-grade uranium and plutonium that were exposed to the atmosphere after a massive tsunami wave hit the reactor. Second, he contends that Israeli intelligence sabotaged the reactor in retaliation for Japan’s support of an independent Palestinian state.

According to Yoichi Shimatsu, a former editor of Japan Times Weekly, these nuclear materials were shipped to the plant in 2007 on the orders of Dick Cheney and George W. Bush, with the connivance of Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert. The shipment was in the form of warhead cores secretly removed from the U.S. nuclear warheads facility BWXT Plantex near Amarillo, Texas. While acting as the middleman, Israel transported warheads from the port of Houston, and in the process kept the best ones while giving the Japanese older warhead cores that had to be further enriched at Fukushima.

Shimatsu credits retired CIA agent and mercenary Roland Vincent Carnaby with learning the warheads were being transported from Houston. In a strange twist, Carnaby was mysteriously shot dead less than a year later by Houston police at a traffic stop. He was shot once in the back and once in the chest. He did not have a weapon in his hands. Intelligence sources said he had been tracking a Mossad unit that was smuggling U.S. plutonium out of Houston docks for an Israeli nuclear reactor.

In an even more explosive charge, the journalist says that 20 minutes before the Fukushima plant’s nuclear meltdown, Israel was so upset with Japanese support for a Palestinian declaration of statehood that it double-crossed Japan by unleashing the Stuxnet virus on the plant’s computers. The virus hampered the shutdown, leading to fallout from a section of the plant housing uranium and plutonium retrieved from the warheads supplied in 2007.

While it is impossible to verify some of Shimatsu’s claims, there was a massive cover-up at the time of the Fukushima disaster in March. Explosions at the site were immediately downplayed. While it was subsequently reported that three reactors suffered meltdowns, Japanese authorities tried to rate the disaster as a Level 4 on the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale, although outside experts declared it a 7, which is the highest level.

Something worth noting is how in 2009, two years after Shimatsu says the warheads were secretly moved to Japan, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) issued a veiled warning to Japan not to abandon its anti-nuclear weapons policy.

The IAEA had to know, however, that Japan has long retained the potential to build nuclear weapons. That was made clear as far back as 1996 when a leaked Ministry of Foreign Affairs document exposed how Japan had been promoting a dual strategy in respect to nuclear weapons since the mid-1960s. It would often publicly profess a non-nuclear policy while maintaining the ability to build a nuclear arsenal. The Liberal Democratic Party, which has dominated Japanese politics, has always said there is no constitutional impediment to nukes.

A factor that undoubtedly would have encouraged the Bush-Cheney White House to provide Japan with the means to secretly build nukes was the growing power of China. Cheney and Bush sought to arm Japan and India with nuclear weapons as a means of curbing China.

Monday, March 27, 2017


All of these fake "hate crimes" are designed so that they can create more draconian laws to stop people telling The Truth about Jews. It's not working. The avalanche of Truth now pouring forth will not be stopped. This evil cult is now being fully exposed.

Source Article:
Second Israeli Arrested for JCC Threats
The arrest of a second Jew for the wave of “anti-Jewish hate crimes” against Jewish Community Centers (JCC) in the U.S. has left Jewish supremacist organizations and individuals scrambling to explain why the single greatest spree of “anti-Semitic” incidents in recent history originated in Israel.

According to a report in the Jerusalem Post, the second arrest is that of the father of the 18-year-old Jew arrested earlier for over 100 bomb threats to JCCs in the U.S. and elsewhere.

The father’s detention was extended until March 30, on charges that he was “involved in most of the same crimes and many of the threatening telephone calls.”

The suspect’s mother was also questioned, as the unusually large antenna and other extraordinary hardware used by her husband and son in the conspiracy were so unusual that it is extremely unlikely that she would not have been aware of what was going on.

According to a report by the Religion News Service’s Lauren Markoe, as published in the Colorado Gazette, “Jews worldwide uttered a collective gasp” when they found out that the threats to “more than 135 Jewish institutions across North America is Jewish himself.”

The “collective gasp” turned out, however, to be just another outburst of anti-Gentile hatred, as summed up by the article’s quote from Deborah Lipstadt, “who studies anti-Semitism at Emory University,” who said that she didn’t “know if it would be better if we found out if it was a right-wing white Supremacist, Neo Nazi, or follower of ISIS.”

The Gazette report went on to say that “now many worry that the suspect’s identity will lend credence to anti-Semites’ common claim that Jews exaggerate threats and crimes against them.”

This is of course a very valid “worry”—especially because there is a long record of fake hate crimes being perpetrated by Jews.

Fake Jewish hate crimes go back decades: For example, as early as 1963, five Jews were arrested in New York City while painting swastikas on the front of the Israeli Consulate-General building, a building which also housed the Israeli mission to the United Nations.

U.S. President Donald Trump, perhaps having some insight into the nature of the latest investigation, drew fire from the media when he was quoted as saying that the new wave of “anti-Semitic threats” were faked and intended to besmirch him and his movement.

At the time, the Jewish Supremacists and the media went into overdrive in their hatred for Trump over these comments, with the Jewish Forward newspaper saying on March 6, 2017
that “Trump’s ‘false flag’ comment about Jews and anti-Semitism is dangerous.”

That newspaper—which summed up Jewish and controlled media reaction across the board—said that Trump’s suggestion was allowing “many [to] believe these anti-Semitic threats are in fact ‘false flags’ nefariously carried out by Jews in order to tear down Trump.

“Analysts call this Jewish ‘false flag’ allegation one of the oldest—and most effective—anti-Semitic ‘dog whistles’ out there: silent to most, but loud and clear to others,” the Forward continued.

Jewish organizations will doubtless attempt to explain the exposure of yet another fake hate crime by their co-religionists by claiming that the two arrested Jews have “mental health issues”—anything except admit the truth.

Sunday, March 26, 2017


The Jewish community suffers from extreme mental illness. This is the same sexually depraved, Luciferian cult that annually swings tens of thousands of chickens over their heads for a sadistic ritual of animal sacrifice called "kapparot," imagining they can put all their evil deeds into the chickens and have a happy life!!! The adults in this degenerate cult attack the children sexually when they are very young (infant circumcision being a prime example) but feel no remorse about the harm they cause.

Sheesh! And we wonder why there are so many gay men coming out of the Jewish community and why it is Jews who promote the homosexual, transgender, and pedophilia agenda! It's easy to think these creatures are not fully human. And perhaps this is the key to understanding what we are really dealing with

Source Article:
Ultra-Orthodox Sex Abuse Whistleblower Describes "Child-Rape Assembly Line"

The last we heard from ultra-Orthodox sex abuse whistleblower Rabbi Nuchem Rosenberg he was recovering from an assault involving a cup of bleach tossed in his face on a Williamsburg sidewalk. Rosenberg, who was nearly blinded, has become anathema in the tightly-knit Satmar community for exposing perpetrators of sexual abuse. Almost a year after the bleach attack, Vice checks in on Rosenberg, who of course has more horrifying stories to tell:

On a visit to Jerusalem in 2005, Rabbi Rosenberg entered into a mikvah in one of the holiest neighborhoods in the city, Mea She’arim. “I opened a door that entered into a schvitz,” he told me. “Vapors everywhere, I can barely see. My eyes adjust, and I see an old man, my age, long white beard, a holy-looking man, sitting in the vapors. On his lap, facing away from him, is a boy, maybe seven years old. And the old man is having anal sex with this boy.”

Rabbi Rosenberg paused, gathered himself, and went on: “This boy was speared on the man like an animal, like a pig, and the boy was saying nothing. But on his face—fear. The old man [looked at me] without any fear, as if this was common practice. He didn’t stop. I was so angry, I confronted him. He removed the boy from his penis, and I took the boy aside. I told this man, ‘It’s a sin before God, a mishkovzucher. What are you doing to this boy’s soul? You’re destroying this boy!’ He had a sponge on a stick to clean his back, and he hit me across the face with it. ‘How dare you interrupt me!’ he said. I had heard of these things for a long time, but now I had seen.”

Rabbi Rosenberg believes around half of young males in Brooklyn’s Hasidic community have been victims of sexual assault, but Ben Hirsch, director of Survivors for Justice, tells Vice, "From anecdotal evidence, we’re looking at over 50 percent. It has almost become a rite of passage." And yet it's extremely rare that any of the perpetrators are brought to justice, a fact that may have cost Brooklyn DA Charles Hynes his job.

Hynes was widely criticized for failing to aggressively prosecute sex offenders in the politically-powerful community (as well as refusing to publicize the names of the few who were convicted). Last week he lost a desperate reelection bid to Ken Thompson, who slammed Hynes for failing to properly vet allegations against another sex abuse whistleblower, Sam Kellner.

Kellner, you'll recall, was accused of trying to shake down an alleged child molester, Baruch Lebovits, for money in exchange for his silence. Like Rabbi Rosenberg, Kellner became a pariah in the community for his role in bringing Rosenberg to justice, but his life got even worse when Hynes's office turned on him. Although the case against Kellner has completely fallen apart—a key witness has recanted his testimony against Kellner, a secretly recorded conversation between Kellner and one of his accusers was distorted in translation—Hynes refuses to drop it. According to today's Times:

Two prosecutors with the Brooklyn district attorney’s office promised to drop all charges against Mr. Kellner. An already-weak extortion case had utterly disintegrated, with evidence falling away. You’ll soon be free of the shadow of prosecution, Mr. Kellner’s lawyers told him.

That was last Wednesday. Two days later, District Attorney Charles J. Hynes and his rackets chief and longtime friend Michael F. Vecchione reversed that decision and again vowed to prosecute Mr. Kellner. They promptly demoted the two veteran prosecutors, Joseph Alexis and Nicholas J. Batsidis, who had handled the case against Mr. Kellner.

Mr. Hynes was not finished. That same day, he fired Barbara Burke, a prosecutor and former nun who had had the temerity to complain that the office had not passed along — as required — all records to a lawyer trying a wrongful conviction case against Mr. Hynes and Mr. Vecchione.

Hynes, 78, had previously promised to help Thompson with a smooth transition. But as Times columnist Michael Powell puts it, Hynes has "ended a once proud career in a manner akin to crashing a car into a brick wall." Read the whole story here, as well as the sickening Vice feature on Rosenberg, and Hella Winston's article in The Jewish Week, which broke the Hynes news yesterday. [Via Failed Messiah]