Thursday, September 15, 2016



Source Article:
Pornhub hubbub: Russians react to XXX site ban

"...Russian courts have ruled that two popular adult websites, Pornhub and YouPorn, will be banned in Russia...

The agency did not specify why the courts ordered the sites to be blocked, but reiterated its advice from the last time it banned Pornhub in 2015. Answering a person on Twitter who asked whether the watchdog offered any alternative to the adult site, it said the alternative is to go out and meet somebody in real life..."

Russian courts have ruled that two popular adult websites, Pornhub and YouPorn, will be banned in Russia. With access to the troves of free porn suspended, Russian social networks exploded with sarcasm.

Both sites were added to the blacklist of Russian media by internet watchdog Roskomnadzor on Tuesday.

The agency did not specify why the courts ordered the sites to be blocked, but reiterated its advice from the last time it banned Pornhub in 2015. Answering a person on Twitter who asked whether the watchdog offered any alternative to the adult site, it said the alternative is to go out and meet somebody in real life.

Pornhub asked the internet watchdog whether the use of premium accounts would be enough to have the ban removed. The agency refused, saying that “the demography is not a commodity.”

The Russian mechanism for fighting illegal content online allows low-level courts to ban even very popular sites, which occasionally leads to public outcry.

Temporary bans in the past affected sites and services such as Wikipedia, Apple’s iCloud, YouTube, and even Roskomnadzor’s own website.

Meanwhile, people in Russia have complained that their favorite destination for adult content was no longer available. RT collected a sample of the complaints.

They say they blocked Pornhub in Russia. Here you go:
( . ) ( . )
No need to thank me.


An epidemic of teens becoming addicted to pornography has swept across our planet and has now reached crisis proportions. Relationships between young men and women have fallen into the crapper and there is little hope that these young people will ever be able to experience authentic and enduring human love.

Porn use is causing erectile dysfunction amongst very young men, and in one study 30% of young men reported suffering from porn-induced erectile dysfunction.

Porn addiction interferes with loving relationships and porn-addicts are often unable to be intimate with a real female partner. Herein lies the key to what pornography is truly all about.

In my talk entitled "Pornography and the Deliberate Manipulation of Human Sexuality," I expose the link between pornography and sorcery. I show, beyond the shadow of a doubt, that pornography is a Luciferian weapon designed to destroy Mankind's ability to love. The fact that porn is now being introduced into kindergarten classrooms and children as young as five are learning about masturbation, explicit sex acts, abortion, homosexuality, sexually transmitted diseases, and more should concern us all. The dark ones are spreading their version of satanic sexuality all across our planet and the most frightening thing of all is that they have taken over the schools in an attempt to prep our children for pedophilia.

In every instance, we have Jews to thank for this filth and for saturating our world with pornography and other forms of debase sexuality and sexual perversion.

Jews are also responsible for bringing infant circumcision to America and lying through their teeth about the so-called benefits of this ritual sexual torture and genital mutilation of newborn infants (see my book, "Birth Trauma and the Dark Side of Modern Medicine," for more information about this).

Jews totally control the porn industry (see here, here, here, here, here) and their Talmud tells them it is OK to have sex with 3-year-olds. They are obsessed with anal sex and bestiality and it has been posited that this obsession with anuses and feces is due to the fact that they are parasites.

What is happening in America today is exactly what was happening in Germany before the Jews had Germany and the German people completely wiped out.

I know, I know -- you thought it was the Jews who were holocausted by the Germans. But that is a lie and a complete Luciferian reversal of what actually happened. In truth, 15+ million Germans were holocausted by the Jews and those who participated as their "allies.

In any event, in reading the article below please keep in my mind that it is the JEWS who are behind this evil and in truth, wherever you find evil, there you will also find the Jewish hand.

Source Article:
Sex Before Kissing: How 15-Year-Old Girls Are Dealing With Porn-Addicted Boys

“[I want] better education regarding sex for both boys and girls [and] information about pornography, and the way it influences harmful sexual practices.”

These are the words of Lucy, aged 15, one of 600 young Australian women and girls who took part in a just-released survey commissioned by Plan Australia and Our Watch. The survey, conducted by Ipsos, gathered responses from the girls and young women aged 15-19 in all states and territories.

In the survey report, entitled Don’t send me that pic, participants reported that online sexual abuse and harassment were becoming a normal part of their everyday interactions. And while the behavior seemed so common, more than 80% said it was unacceptable for boyfriends to request naked images.

Sexual bullying and harassment are part of daily life for many girls growing up as a part of this digital generation. Young girls are speaking out more and more about how these practices have links with pornography—because it’s directly affecting them.

Pornography is molding and conditioning the sexual behaviors and attitudes of boys, and girls are being left without the resources to deal with these porn-saturated boys.

If there are still any questions about whether porn has an impact on young people’s sexual attitudes and behaviors, perhaps it’s time to listen to young people themselves. Girls and young women describe boys pressuring them to provide acts inspired by the porn they consume routinely. Girls tell of being expected to put up with things they don’t enjoy.

Some see sex only in terms of performance, where what counts most is the boy enjoying it. I asked a 15-year-old about her first sexual experience. She replied: “I think my body looked OK. He seemed to enjoy it.” Many girls seem cut off from their own sense of pleasure or intimacy. The main marker of a “good” sexual encounter is only if he enjoyed it. Girls and young women are under a lot of pressure to give boys and men what they want, to become a real life embodiment of what the boys have watched in porn, adopting exaggerated roles and behaviors and providing their bodies as mere sex aids. Growing up in today’s porn culture, girls quickly learn that they are service stations for male gratification and pleasure.

When asked, “How do you know a guy likes you?,” an 8th grade girl replied: “He still wants to talk to you after you [give him oral sex].” A male high school student said to a girl: “If you [give me oral sex] I’ll give you a kiss.” Girls are expected to provide sex acts for tokens of affection, and are coached through it by porn-taught boys. A 15-year-old girl said she didn’t enjoy sex at all, but that getting it out of the way quickly was the only way her boyfriend would stop pressuring her and watch a movie.

7th grade girls are increasingly seeking help on what to do about requests for naked images. Receiving texts like “send me a picture of your tits” is an almost daily occurrence for many young girls. The girl asks: “How do I say no without hurting his feelings?”

As the Plan Australia/Our Watch report found, girls are tired of being pressured for images they don’t want to send, but they seem resigned to send them anyways because of how normal the practice has become. Boys then typically use the images as a form of currency, to swap and share with their friends. Often times boys will use the revealing pics to humiliate girls publicly if there is a bad break up.

7th grade girls are asking questions about bondage and S&M. Many of them have seen 50 Shades of Grey, and wonder if a boy wants to hit me, tie me up and stalk me, does that mean he loves me? Girls are tolerating demeaning and disrespectful behaviors, and thereby internalizing pornography’s messages about their submissive role.

Girls describe being groped in the school yard, and being routinely sexually harassed at school or on the school bus on the way home. They are saying that boys act like they are entitled to girls’ bodies, like girls are only there to pleasure them. It is partially true what defenders of porn often say, porn does provide sex education—but not in the way they think. It teaches middle school boys that women and girls are there for his pleasure and that they are always up for sex. To them, no just means persuade me.

Girls describe being ranked at school on their bodies, and are sometimes compared to the bodies of porn stars. They know they can’t compete, but that doesn’t stop them from thinking that they have to. Requests for genital surgery have tripled in a little over a decade among young women aged 15-24. Girls who don’t undergo porn-inspired waxing are often considered ugly, dirty, or gross by boys, as well as by other girls.

Some girls suffer physical injury from porn-inspired sexual acts, including anal sex. The director of a domestic violence centre on the Gold Coast wrote to Collective Shout about the increase in porn-related injuries to girls aged 14 and up, from acts including torture:

“In the past few years we have had a huge increase in intimate partner rape of women from 14 to 80+. The biggest common denominator is consumption of porn by the offender. With offenders not able to differentiate between fantasy and reality, believing women are ‘up for it’ 24/7, ascribing to the myth that ‘no means yes and yes means anal,’ oblivious to injuries caused and never ever considering consent. We have seen a huge increase in deprivation of liberty, physical injuries, torture, drugging, filming and sharing footage without consent.”

The Australian Psychological Society estimates that adolescent boys are responsible for around 20% of rapes of adult women and between 30% and 50% of all reported sexual assaults of children. Just last week, Emeritus Professor Freda Briggs argued that online pornography is turning children into copycat sexual predators, acting out on other children what they are seeing in porn.

A 2012 review of research on “The Impact of Internet Pornography on Adolescents” found that adolescent consumption of internet porn was linked to attitudinal changes, including acceptance of male dominance and female submission as the primary sexual paradigm, with women viewed as “sexual playthings eager to fulfill male sexual desires.” The authors found that “adolescents who are intentionally exposed to violent sexually explicit material were six times more likely to be sexually aggressive than those who were not exposed.”

The proliferation and globalization of hypersexualized imagery and pornographic themes makes healthy sexual exploration almost impossible. Sexual conquest and domination are untempered by the bounds of respect, intimacy and authentic human connection. Young people are not learning about intimacy, friendship and love, but about cruelty and humiliation. As a recent study found:

“Online mainstream pornography overwhelmingly centered on acts of violence and degradation toward women, the sexual behaviors exemplified in pornography skew away from intimacy and tenderness and typify patriarchal constructions of masculinity and femininity.”

It is intimacy and tenderness that so many girls and young women say they are looking for. But how will young women find these sensual, slow-burn experiences in men indoctrinated by pornography? Psychologist Philip Zimbardo says of young men: “They don’t know the language of face to face contact … Constant arousal, change, novelty excitement makes them out of sync with slow developing relationships – relationships which build slowly.”

Most importantly, it’s young people themselves demanding change. Josie, 18, is quoted in the Plan Australia/Our Watch report:

“We need some sort of crack down on the violent pornography that is currently accessible to boys and men. This violent pornography should be illegal to make or view in Australia as we clearly have a problem with violence and boys are watching a lot of pornography which can be very violent … This is influencing men’s attitude towards women and what they think is acceptable. Violent pornography is infiltrating Australian relationships.”

Girls like Lucy and Josie deserve our response. It is wrong to leave sexual formation in the hands of the global sex industry. We need to do more to help young people stand up against warped notions of sexuality conveyed in pornography.

Fight the New Drug is all about pro-love and pro-healthy sexuality. That is why we are anti-porn. Porn is full of ideals and beliefs that are completely opposite of what real relationships, real sex, and real love are like. Healthy relationships are built on equality, honesty, respect, and love. But in porn, it’s the reverse; interactions are based on domination, disrespect, abuse, violence, and detachment. Our generation is the first to deal with the issue of pornography to this intensity and scale. And, as we’ve seen with today’s society, if we don’t take a stand, the problem is only going to get worse and worse. By being informed and understanding porn’s harmful effects, we can make a much needed change to our perceptions about love, sex, and relationships."

Thursday, September 1, 2016


This is an excellent article! I wish it would have gone deeper into the methods they are using to program the children and mention the fact that the "demented political agenda" is actually spiritual warfare and a Luciferian rebellion against the natural order of Creation -- i.e., against the Creator's design. But even without these deeper points, this is still a great article. Check it out.

Source Article by Mike Adams:
The transgender programming of children is child abuse, warns the American College of Pediatricians... chemical castration, genital mutilation and mental illness run amok…

(NaturalNews) So this guy walks into an OB/GYN clinic and demands a gynecological exam. The doctor, a woman, takes one look at him and says, "That won't work. You're a man." The man, however, "self identifies" as a woman and blasts the doctor for being a bigot. "I self identify as a woman," he says. "And I demand to be treated as a woman, or I'll call my civil rights lawyer."

The doctor, not wanting to be called a bigot, proceeds to give the man a fake gynecological exam, playing into his delusional distortions about his own biology and arguably worsening his mental disconnect with his physical self.

This is what transgenderism and "biological subjectivism" has come to in America today... a politically correct demand that everyone agree to participate in the mental distortions of a few individuals who suffer from a psychological disconnect from their biological realities. Such ideologies stand in complete contradiction to the known science on biology and physical reality, and sadly, this mental distortion is now being thrust onto children as part of a sick, demented political agenda to appease the most lunatic fringe elements of the political spectrum.

That agenda now demands that public schools be turned into transgender child factories, churning out confused, suicidal children who are physically and chemically mutilated by a society that applauds them for denying their biological reality. This entire agenda, now being waged against the children of America by politically motivated cultural arsonists, is nothing less than a crime against children.

The science is clear: The biology of gender is a physical reality that's not subject to "impersonation"

"Human sexuality is an objective biological binary trait," explains the American College of Pediatricians. "The American College of Pediatricians urges educators and legislators to reject all policies that condition children to accept as normal a life of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex. Facts – not ideology – determine reality."

When President Obama orders schools across America to normalize transgender confusion in children, he worsens that confusion in the minds of children who are still grappling with their biologically driven gender identity. "A person's belief that he or she is something they are not is, at best, a sign of confused thinking," explains the ACP. "When an otherwise healthy biological boy believes he is a girl, or an otherwise healthy biological girl believes she is a boy, an objective psychological problem exists that lies in the mind not the body, and it should be treated as such. These children suffer from gender dysphoria."

Although liberal ideology can pretend that transgenderism is a "third sex," this is fairy tale thinking. There is no third sex. And a man pretending to be a woman does not make that person a woman. Hence, "biological subjectivism" is delusional thinking. Yet it is a delusion that is being thrust upon the entire population via shaming tactics of political correctness.

Alarmingly, this politically motivated transgender agenda has now invaded our schools, where vulnerable children will be easily swept into the confusing, abusive world of chemical castrations and genital mutilation surgery while being applauded by obedient conformists for having the "courage" to deny their biological existence.

And so we now live in a nation where child-abusing parents who need to be locked away in mental institutions are turning their children into gender confused basket cases who may also end up needing psychiatric intervention. This is how the cycle perpetuates, and the political powers in Washington are encouraging this cycle of mental illness, child mutilation and horrible suffering among children who are now being shoved toward transgenderism because it appeases the perverse political appetites of mentally ill adults.

Transgender advocacy called "child abuse" by the American College of Pediatricians

From the ACP:

Conditioning children into believing that a lifetime of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex is normal and healthful is child abuse. Endorsing gender discordance as normal via public education and legal policies will confuse children and parents, leading more children to present to "gender clinics" where they will be given puberty-blocking drugs. This, in turn, virtually ensures that they will "choose" a lifetime of carcinogenic and otherwise toxic cross-sex hormones, and likely consider unnecessary surgical mutilation of their healthy body parts as young adults.

Keep in mind that encouraging children to pursue transgender ideologies eventually leads to chemical castration and / or genital mutilation via surgery.

Gender confusion may be common in children, but nearly all of them eventually grow out of the confusion and come to accept the biology they were born with. "According to the DSM-V, as many as 98% of gender confused boys and 88% of gender confused girls eventually accept their biological sex after naturally passing through puberty," explains the ACP.

Yet when society coddles gender-confused children and encourages them to change their biological sex through chemical castration and surgical mutilation, it deprives such children the opportunity to explore, learn and grow beyond their early confusion. To declare a child to be a "transgender" in need of chemical and surgical mutilation is a crime against children.

As the ACP explains: "Never has it been more scientifically clear that children and adolescents are incapable of making informed decisions regarding permanent, irreversible and life-altering medical interventions. For this reason, the College maintains it is abusive to promote this ideology, first and foremost for the well-being of the gender dysphoric children themselves, and secondly, for all of their non-gender-discordant peers, many of whom will subsequently question their own gender identity, and face violations of their right to bodily privacy and safety."

It's time to stop the transgender programming of children in our society

Transgenderism, says the ACP, is "child abuse" and a kind of mental illness. Its very ideology exists in contradiction to physical and biological reality, where chromosomes determine biological sex, and nearly all children eventually learn to accept the reality of their physical bodies, even if they are temporarily confused.

The transgender programming of children is a politically motivated agenda to cause an acceleration in gender confusion and distorted gender identities among the population. It is rooted in a fundamental mass mental illness of a delusional society, where "reality" is now played out via political memes and social media shaming rather than biology reality or even the real world of nature all around us.

When it comes to physical biology, the answer is clear: Sex is binary. You are either born with male biology or female biology. There are extremely rare cases of hermaphroditic genetic expression, but this is not a "third sex." It is a genetic and / or formative disorder.

Mother Nature intends for all humans to be born as either male or female. It is self-evident in the genetic code, the biochemistry and the reproduction of the species. To teach a child that he or she exists in contradiction to the biology they were born with is a violation of nature and a form of mental abuse against those children.

Children need to be connected to their bodies and learn to accept and honor the "hardware" they were born with. To teach a child that they are disconnected from their biological self is to invite and encourage runaway shame, peer ridicule and tortorous mental illness in that child, which is one reason why suicide rates are so alarmingly high among those who pursue a transgender lifestyle.

Thanks, Obama, for not just screwing up our entire economy, our justice system, our community policing, our foreign policy and our border control. Now you're screwing with the mental health of our children, too! Got any more destruction planned before you leave office?

Saturday, August 27, 2016


Source Article:
How to Protect Yourself if You are Force-Vaccinated

Vaccinations have a strong history of causing damage to health. The very first vaccination for smallpox caused tremendous health damage, while also increasing the incidence of small pox. The damage caused by polio vaccinations continued this trend. Newer vaccinations continue to destroy health and even kill their recipients. [1]

While many are able to choose to refuse this dangerous medical procedure, others are threatened with refusal of entry in day care, schools, and universities if they remain unvaccinated. Others are forced to choose between employment or vaccinations. Pressure to vaccinate is especially strong for those employed by health care and the US military.

While the best option is to employ whatever exemptions may exist in your state, for many individuals, there appears to be no good escape route. This is a very sad state of affairs.

Individuals caught in this predicament may still choose to use health practices which will reduce the likelihood of vaccine health damage.

One Vaccination at a Time

It makes sense that reducing the toxic load would reduce the potential damage of vaccinations. Obtaining as few vaccines at one time as possible should logically reduce the risks for damage. Obtaining only one vaccine at a time is the best option, if one chooses to vaccinate.

Statistical data on vaccine damage supports this idea. Medical researcher Neil Z. Miller warns parents to avoid multiple vaccines at one visit, which can lead to serious reactions, including death. Miller discovered that 5.4 percent of vaccine reactions for those receiving five or more vaccines were fatal. Due to underreporting of vaccine injuries, this number is likely to be much higher.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) continues to recommend infants receive eight vaccines (polio, diphtheria, hepatitis B, rotavirus, pneumococcal, tetanus, haemophilus influenza B and pertussis) at ages 2, 4 and 6 months, in spite of no safety studies. [2]

Avoid Vaccines When Ill

While conventionally trained physicians will almost always recommend vaccinating a sick child or adult, integrative-minded practitioners warn against this practice. The immune system is already compromised, so introducing more toxins to the body will more likely overwhelm the individual’s fight to detoxify. [3]

Do NOT Use Acetaminophen with Vaccinations

Comparing children in Cuba to those in the US, autism rates were significantly lower in Cuba. Several practices can account for this, including less and safer vaccine use in Cuba.

Another practice difference discovered was the routine use of acetaminophen prior to and after vaccines in the US. Acetaminophen found in Tylenol is used for pain relief, but it also reduces the production of glutathione, a powerful antioxidant used to eliminate toxins. [4]

Vitamin C

Vitamin C has been shown in several studies to be highly effective at neutralizing the neurotoxin mercury which is found in many vaccines. It is recommended to take vitamin C prior to and after vaccinations. Dr. Russell Blaylock recommends 1,000 milligrams of buffered vitamin C four times daily between meals in his vaccination detox protocol. [5, 6]

Use of Detox and Immune-Strengthening Protocol

Dr. Russell Blaylock is a respected neurosurgeon who has written extensively about vaccine dangers. Dr. Blaylock has outlined a detailed protocol which can be used to reduce the effects of toxic vaccinations.

Dr. Blaylock’s first suggestion is to bring a cold pack with you when vaccinated, and place on the injection site as soon as possible to help block an immune reaction. A cold pack and cold showers can also be used the following day.

Blaylocks’s protocol includes the use of several powerful, safe antioxidants curcumin, quercetin and EPA omega 3 one hour prior to vaccination, as well as several days following vaccines.

Blaylock recommends children take 5,000 units of D3 and adults 20,000 units of D3 for two weeks following vaccinations. The natural form of vitamin E, high in gamma-E, is recommended to reduce inflammatory cytokines. Taking a multivitamin high in B vitamins and selenium, but absent of iron, is also suggested.

Other suggested supplementation include magnesium citrate, zinc, calcium and astaxanthin.

Blaylock also recommends 8 ounces of detox smoothies with parsley and celery, taken twice daily.

Holistic physician Sircus has a very similar detox protocol to Dr. Blaylock, with a cold pack and vitamin C dosing as a first line of defense. Sircus emphasizes using baking soda to neutralize the poisons contained in vaccinations. Sircus recommends water hydration to help detoxify the body, as well as magnesium and spirulina. He also stresses the importance of using vitamins and nutrients, referencing Blaylock’s protocol, as well as avoiding other toxins in the environment. [7]


Avoiding vaccines is the best line of defense against exposure to dangerous toxins. If one is faced with the necessity to vaccinate, there are several important health measures which may reduce damage.

Not vaccinating when ill, and spreading out vaccinations as much as possible can reduce likelihood of vaccine damage.

Use of a cold pack immediately following vaccination can help block an immune reaction. Use of vitamin C before and after vaccination is considered critical. Deciding on a protocol inclusive of several antioxidants including vitamins D3 and E is important. Smoothies made with celery and parsley and/or use of baking soda can help detox poisons from the body.

Avoiding acetaminophen before and after vaccinations is also a helpful guideline.
Many individuals understandably feel helpless when forced to vaccinate by their employers or schools, but utilizing these recommendations can hopefully minimize the negative impact of vaccinations.


Thursday, August 25, 2016



Source Article:
Free Sperm For All: Jewish Married Man Offers Free Sperm Behind Wife’s Back

TIMES OF ISRAEL – Ari Nagel’s wife said to be ‘devastated’ by news he provides sperm via intercourse or in a cup to women looking to have a baby without using sperm banks.

A jewish math professor from Brooklyn who sired 22 children over the past 18 years is a married man raising three children with his wife.

Ari Nagel, 40, who in last week’s New York Post said he provides his sperm for free — through intercourse or in a cup — to lesbian couples and single women looking to have a babyand who cannot afford the expense of a sperm bank, revealed on Sunday that he has been married for the past 12 years and has three children with his wife, ages 12, five and two.

In last week’s article, Nagel said he often produces the sperm in a men’s bathroom at Target or Starbucks, giving it to the recipient in a menstrual cup, who then immediately inserts it in the ladies room. Nagel attributed his success in helping women conceive to his high sperm count, coupled with his good looks and attractive personality.

According to Nagel, a math professor at CUNY Kingsborough, his wife Roxanne knew about his extra-curricular activities even if she wasn’t thrilled.

“She was never happy about all these other kids, but she tolerated it,” he told the Post after a reader who came upon the initial article said she was “devastated” by the article and “had no idea this was happening.”

Nagel did admit that his wife was “livid” and “yelling at me a lot” after the article was published but said that their marriage has been on the rocks for years and that they sleep in separate bedrooms.

The math professor said the two had a “complicated” marriage and that even as “she knew what was going on, she didn’t support it. She always wanted me to be a regular, traditional spouse.”

His wife Roxanne, reached outside her home by the Post said: “I have nothing to say. What’s done is done.”

According to the report, Nagel is set to sire a 23rd child after impregnating another single mom, and has received additional requests in the “triple digits” for his sperm.

He said he’s heard from women “all over the world, places I never heard of. Almost all of them want to have a baby, but some want to hook up.”

Nagel said he was raised in an Orthodox Jewish family with six siblings, and through his sperm donations can have a lot of children and still sleep at night.

“I just love seeing how happy the moms and kids are … That’s why I do this. It’s the gift that keeps on giving,” he told the Post.

He said he babysits for some of the kids and attends birthday parties, and was present at some of the deliveries.

He has successfully been sued for child support five times and told the Post that half of his paycheck is garnished for child support. He told the newspaper that the women all promise in advance that they won’t sue.

He has kids in Florida, Illinois, Virginia, Connecticut and Israel, and said he does not regret any of them.


The following post got me banned from facebook for 30 days, perhaps because the article discusses the fact that teenagers are connecting with pornography through facebook!!! Pornography pops up on their screen while they are trying to talk with their friends.

Of course, we all know that facebook is wholly controlled by Jews and that Jews totally control the pornography industry. They have used this Luciferian weapon to hijack the sexuality of young people, especially boys.

Jews have also mainstreamed circumcision in the U.S. -- that is to say they have mainstreamed the sexual torture and genital mutilation of infants whose neurological wires will be imprinted with a connection between sex and violence because they were sexually tortured straight out of the womb.

All parents have a responsibility to address what is happening to the boys and understand who is behind this evil. At every turn, you will find it is THE JEWS.

Source Article:
Experiment that convinced me online porn is the most pernicious threat facing children today: By ex-lads' mag editor MARTIN DAUBNEY

As the presenter of a Channel 4 documentary called Porn On The Brain, airing next Monday at 10pm, I'd been invited to sit in on a forward-thinking class led by sex education consultant Jonny Hunt, who is regularly asked into schools to discuss sex and relationships. To establish what these kids knew about sex - including pornography - he had asked the children to write an A-Z list of the sexual terms they knew, no matter how extreme.

Most of these children had just hit puberty and some were clearly still children: wide-eyed, nervous, with high-pitched voices.

Some of the girls were beginning their first forays into make-up. Several wore braces on their teeth. Everybody was smartly turned out in school uniform, and the most anti-authority statement in the room was a tie worn deliberately short. A One Direction pencil case lay on a desk. These were clearly good children, from good homes. So far, so very, very ordinary.

But when Jonny pinned their lists on the board, it turned out that the children's extensive knowledge of porn terms was not only startling, it superseded that of every adult in the room - including the sex education consultant himself.

'Nugget, what's that?' asked Jonny.

'A nugget is a girl who has no arms or legs and has sex in a porno movie,' chortled one young, pimply boy, to an outburst of embarrassed laughter from some, and outright revulsion from others.

The adults in attendance were incredulous at the thought that not only did this kind of porn exist, but that a 14-year-old boy may have actually watched it.

But the more mundane answers were just as shocking. For example, the first word every single boy and girl in the group put on their list was 'anal'.

When questioned, they had all - every child in a class of 20 - seen sodomy acted out in porn videos. I was stunned they even knew about it - I certainly hadn't heard of it at that age - let alone had watched it and as a result may even have wanted to try it.

One 15-year-old girl said, 'Boys expect porn sex in real life'. And one boy - to choruses of approval - spoke of his revulsion for pubic hair, which he called a 'gorilla'.

When Jonny pointed out that pubic hair was normal in real life, the boys scoffed, but some of the girls were angry that the boys' template of what to expect from real girls had clearly already been set by porn.

By the end of the hour-long class - and three others that followed with other children - I was profoundly saddened by what I had witnessed. While teenage boys will always be fascinated by, and curious about, sex, what's now considered 'normal' by under-18s is an entirely distorted view of intercourse and the way relationships should be conducted.

It seemed as if the children's entire expectation of sex had been defined by what they see in online porn. The conversation was horrifying enough, yet there was worse to come.

In the playground, I interviewed a brave group of seven bright boys and girls aged 14-15 to ascertain in more detail what online porn they had witnessed.

'Nugget, what's that?' asked Jonny. 'A nugget is a girl who has no arms or legs and has sex in a porno movie,' chortled one young, pimply boy

One boy calmly recalled watching a scene too graphic to describe in a family newspaper, but which had involved an animal.
'You're watching bestiality?' I asked. 'That's illegal. Where are you getting this stuff from?'

'Facebook,' the boy said. 'It just pops up whether you want it or not, sometimes via advertisements. You don't have any control over it.'

A girl added, 'On Facebook, you just scroll down and it's there. If any of your friends like it, it comes up on your home page.'

These kids were balanced, smart and savvy. They were the most academically gifted and sporting in the school. They came from ordinary, hard-working households. This was not 'Broken Britain'.

Some were clearly shocked by what they had seen on the internet.

'I find it dirty and disturbing,' said one 15-year-old boy. 'I try not to look at it, but people just keep sending it to each other. They email disgusting links to each other's mobile phones to shock.'

One girl put her head in her hands and said, 'It's just gross'.

It's horrifying enough for parents to know that children can get porn via the internet. But to think they get it from Facebook - the social media currency that has become a universal must-have for teenagers globally - will strike terror into their hearts.

I asked the teenagers: 'On a scale of one to ten, how likely would you say it is that boys and girls your age are watching porn online?'

The reply was a chorus of tens, nines and one eight.

When I asked the children if there were parental controls on the internet at home, they all said no, their parents trusted them. They all admitted their parents had no idea what they were watching, and would be shocked if they did know.
What I saw at the school was awful, but sadly not unusual.

The findings were backed up in a survey of 80 boys and girls aged 12-16, commissioned for the TV show.

It proves the vast majority of UK teens have seen sexual imagery online, or pornographic films.

According to the survey, the boys appear largely happy about watching porn - and were twice as likely as girls to do so - but the girls are significantly more confused, angry and frightened by online sexual imagery. The more they see, the stronger they feel.

But what impact is this steady diet of online depravity having on the attitudes of boys and girls towards real life relationships, and on their self-esteem?

Could it even have a wider impact on their lives, blighting their ability to function in the world, get good qualifications and jobs?

What I discovered left me truly shocked and saddened.

You might be surprised. After all, from 2003-2010 I edited lad's magazine Loaded.

With its frequent nudity and lewd photo spreads, I'd long been accused of being a soft pornographer, and after leaving Loaded I agonised that my magazine may have switched a generation onto more explicit online porn.

In the documentary I set out on a journey to answer the question: is porn harmless, or is it damaging lives?

My interest was deeply personal, too, as my own beautiful little boy, Sonny, is now four. Even though he has only just started primary school, the Children's Commissioner estimates boys as young as ten are now being exposed to online porn.
I wanted to know what I could do to protect my own son from a seemingly inevitable exposure to hardcore material in just a few years' time.

I used to be sceptical that porn was as damaging a force as the headlines and David Cameron - who recently said it was 'corroding childhood' - suggest. In the past I'd even defended pornography in university debates, on TV and on radio. I claimed it was our freedom of choice to watch it and said it could actually help add to adult relationships.

But what I saw during the making of the film changed my opinion of pornography forever.

The true stories of boys I met whose lives had been totally taken over by porn not only moved me to tears but also made me incredibly angry that this is happening to our children.

And the looks of revulsion on those poor girl's faces in the playground enraged me.

I feel as if an entire generation's sexuality has been hijacked by grotesque online porn.

To find out what porn is doing to young men, and the girls they have relationships with, we spoke to them via online forums and discovered that there were many young lives seriously blighted by an excessive, unhealthy relationship with pornography that can begin when they are as young as 12.

We learned that some had lost their jobs, others had broken relationships, failed exams, or got into serious debt through using porn.

'When you interview young women about their experiences of sex, you see an increased level of violence: rough, violent sex. That is directly because of porn, as young boys are getting their sexual cues from men in porn who are acting as if they're sexual psychopaths'

Take the 19-year-old man I got to know. He was handsome, articulate and in full-time employment as an apprentice electrician. But his life was dominated by his porn habit.

'Every bit of spare time I have is spent watching porn,' he says. 'It is extreme. I can't hold down a relationship for longer than three weeks. I want porn sex with real girls, but sex with them just isn't as good as the porn.'

Having established, like the recent Children's Commissioner report, that 'basically, porn is everywhere', we set out to discover what all this porn was doing to their brains.

Was it having any effect at all? Could it be addictive?

We found Dr Valerie Voon, a neuroscientist at Cambridge University and a global authority on addiction.

Then, in the first study of its kind, we recruited 19 heavy porn users who felt their habit was out of control and had Dr Voon examine their brain activity as they watched, among other things, hardcore porn.

She showed them a variety of images, both stills and videos.

These ranged from images known to excite all men, such as bundles of £50 notes and extreme sports in action, to mundane landscapes and wallpapers - all inter-spliced with hardcore porn videos, plus pictures of both clothed and naked women.
The ways in which their brains responded to this diverse imagery were compared with the responses of a group of healthy volunteers.

She was interested in a particular brain region called the ventral striatum - the 'reward centre' - where our sense of pleasure is produced. This is one of the areas where an addict will show a heightened response to visual representations of their addiction - whether it's a syringe or a bottle of vodka.

'Letting our children consume it freely via the internet is like leaving heroin lying around the house'

What we discovered was a revelation. When shown porn, the reward centre of normal volunteers barely reacted, but that of the compulsive porn users lit up like a Christmas tree.

The compulsive porn users' brains showed clear parallels with those with substance addictions.

Everybody on the project was astounded, even Dr Voon, who admitted she had been 'sceptical and ambivalent' about the study at the outset.

If porn does have the insidious power to be addictive, then letting our children consume it freely via the internet is like leaving heroin lying around the house, or handing out vodka at the school gates.

And this toxic effect is filtering down directly into young girls' lives.

The most shocking testament came from Professor Gail Dines. Regarded as the world's leading anti-pornography campaigner, she has interviewed thousands of men and women about sex and pornography.

'When you interview young women about their experiences of sex, you see an increased level of violence: rough, violent sex,' she says.

'That is directly because of porn, as young boys are getting their sexual cues from men in porn who are acting as if they're sexual psychopaths.

'Pornography is sexually traumatising an entire generation of boys.'

By talking with sexual addiction experts such as Professor John E Grant of the University of Chicago, Dr Paula Hall, the UK's top sex addiction therapist, and Professor Matt Field from the University of Liverpool, we learned that the teenage brain is especially vulnerable to addiction.

The brain's reward centre is fully developed by the time we're teenagers, but the part of the brain that regulates our urges - the pre-frontal cortex - isn't fully developed until our mid-20s. The brains of teenagers are not wired to say 'stop', they are wired to want more. The implications of this study are profoundly troubling.

So who is going to take on the responsibility for protecting our children until they are old enough to do it for themselves?

Can we rely on schools? It strikes me that the current sex education system in the UK - where schools are obliged only to teach the basics of reproduction and the perils of sex, which they can opt out of anyway - is hopelessly outdated.
In the internet age, our children are turning to online porn for an alternative sex education - the worst place they can go.

The Mail claimed a victory in July when David Cameron announced that by the end of 2014 all 19 million UK homes currently connected to the internet will be contacted by service providers and told they must say whether family friendly filters that block all porn sites should be switched on or off.

But our TV show proved that determined children will always find a way around online blocks.

Ultimately, the responsibility lies with us, the parents. The age of innocence is over.

Like many parents, I fear that my boy's childhood could be taken away by pornography. So we have to fight back.

We need to get tech-savvy, and as toe-curling as it seems, we are the first generation that will have to talk to our children about porn.

We have to tell our kids that pornographic sex is fake and real sex is about love, not lust.

By talking to them, they stand a chance. If we stick our head in the sand, we are fooling only ourselves.

Wednesday, August 24, 2016


Thanks Jews!

Source Article:
The money behind the transgender movement Billionaire – George Soros opens his wallet to transform America

The money behind the transgender movement

Billionaire George Soros opens his wallet to transform America

It was a debate that had been percolating at the state level for years. …

The bathroom debate started in California, where the Gay Straight Alliance Network, an organization based in Oakland, has been lobbying hard for transgender rights. …

The GSA helped organize groups in North Carolina. …

In 2013, Mr. Soros‘ gave GSA $100,000.

The Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Community Center also received $130,000 from Mr. Soros that year. Their Leadership Lab was published in the journal Science this spring, that evaluated the impact that door-to-door canvassing can have on reducing transphobia. It’s being used as national model. …

The Global Action for Trans Equality (GATE), headquartered in New York, received $244,000 from Mr. Soros. It’s main purpose is to pull all the LGBT organizations together in order to create a louder megaphone, laying out best practices and fundraising advice.

So what’s next for the movement?

Mr. Soros‘ IRS Form 990 gives us some clues.

He’s funded a Streetwise and Safe organization in New York, with the purpose of supporting a “national project focused on increasing safety for LGBTQ youth during interactions with law enforcement and developing advocacy skills to engage debates around discriminatory policing practices,” according to his 2014 tax return.

Mr. Soros also gave $525,000 to Justice at Stake….

Entire Article

Saturday, August 20, 2016


My talk from Free Your Mind 4 (April 2016) has just been released on youtube. This talk outlines the deliberate and methodical manipulation of human sexuality during the 20th century. Beginning with the Rockefeller-funded "research" of Professor Alfred Kinsey, a well known sadomasochist and pedophile, and continuing on with the introduction of pornography which now saturates our world and has been moved into kindergarten classrooms, our children, our relationships, and even our ability to love is under direct assault. In less than one hundred years, the Luciferian forces have succeeded in manipulating us to such an extent, that our sexual behavior and attitudes have been radically altered, as well as our ability to create happy families and enduring human love. It is imperative for us to understand the mechanisms by which we and our children are being targeted so that we can put a stop to this madness and throw a kink in the control system that seeks to destroy our lives.

This talk is a condensed version of a much longer presentation which goes deep into the mechanisms by which we have been manipulated -- and offers solutions regarding how we can free ourselves from this control. If you would like to know more, please visit this link.

Please also share this video widely so that others will have access to this information.

Pornography and the Deliberate Manipulation of Human Sexuality

Friday, August 5, 2016


Source Article:
First Strike – The Dark Side of The Vitamin K Shot

Apart from the emotional & psychological trauma inflicted on a newborn from getting the Vitamin K shot, the actual amount of Vitamin K injected into a baby’s bloodstream/deep muscle tissue is 20,000 times the needed dose; which represents the first strike undermining capacity for natural immunity.

The injection also contains a toxic preservative, Benzyl alcohol, that can be especially harmful on your baby’s delicate, young immune system.

A parent has to keep asking themselves, ‘Is this procedure really necessary?’ The answer is typically, no! Natural health awareness requires a genuine paradigm shift away from the limitations of western ‘Allopathic’ medicine, a re-education toward self sufficiency.

Trusting in nature’s storehouse of resources, understanding the proportional requirements which best serve the body; the learning curve toward such know-how takes a lot more convincing, especially given the onslaught of mainstream Vaccine Industry propaganda targeting our communities. Knowledge of holistic health provides the only viable solution to halting this trend.

It is also crucial for parents to intervene & sign the necessary paper-work via your family doctor BEFORE your baby is born. Thus you will avoid any oversight by the nursing staff on duty. Remember, the administering of the Vitamin K shot is a STANDARD procedure in most mainstream Medical institutions. Therefore you must make your decision NOT to vaccinate your baby clear to all attending hospital staff members.

The father-to-be should carry all necessary forms (several copies) in his back pocket at all times during the delivery phase. Do not allow your baby to be taken away for a general “health” inspection before handing over these crucial documents.

Make sure you declare your intentions as a family unequivocally, ‘Our baby is not to receive ANY vaccines, whatsoever.’

Note: The same prudent caution should be applied when considering the Hepatitis B shot (typically given within 12 hrs after birth).

Hepatitis B Vaccine – 3 doses, 1st round administered at 12 hours old (after birth): Research scientists have now identified and admitted to a direct causal link between subcutaneous/intramuscular injection of the Hepatitis B Vaccine and resulting Mitochondrial dysfunction (hallmark symptom of Autism); including premature apoptosis or “programmed” type cell death. The Hepatitis B vaccine factors into the eventuality of Early Onset Autism, since it represents the earliest premature breach of a baby’s delicate, under-developed “electrical grid system” (Myelin sheath, Meninges & Blood Brain Barrier).

‘exposure of Hepa1-6 cells to a low dose of adjuvanted hepatitis B vaccine leads to loss of mitochondrial integrity, apoptosis induction, and cell death…‘ In vivo apoptotic effect of hepatitis B vaccine was observed in mouse liver.‘…’Boys vaccinated as neonates had threefold greater odds for autism diagnosis compared to boys never vaccinated or vaccinated after the first month of life. Non-Hispanic white boys were 64% less likely to have autism diagnosis relative to non-white boys. Findings suggest that U.S. male neonates vaccinated with the hepatitis B vaccine prior to 1999 (from vaccination record) had a threefold higher risk for parental report of autism diagnosis compared to boys not vaccinated as neonates during that same time period.‘

Official Package Insert: ‘10 µg/mL Each 1 mL dose of sterile suspension contains hepatitis B surface antigen 10 µg adsorbed onto approximately 0.5 mg of amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate. Formaldehyde-treated. Thimerosal (mercury derivative) 1:20,000 (50 µg/mL) has been added only to the preservative-containing formulations. 3-dose vials of 3 mL‘…’A portion of the hepatitis B virus gene, coding for HBsAg, is cloned (synthetic genomics) into yeast, and the vaccine for hepatitis B is produced from cultures of this recombinant yeast strain.‘

Note: It is highly advisable to delay the cord-clamping of the placental connected umbilical cord (while this lifeline is still pulsating), to maximise the nutritional flow from the Placenta, and minimize any undue stress on your baby, during this vital transition phase. Make certain your family doctor is advised of this decision well in advance. You may also consider abstaining from allowing hospital staff to acquire a DNA blood sample, given the fact that such confidential information is routinely shared in a National DNA data bank. Your baby is not a statistic.

‘Babies who have been identified as being at risk for vitamin K deficiency include those born to mothers who took drugs or antibiotics during pregnancy, premature babies and babies who are born cesarean. Mothers who had maternity diets low in high vitamin K foods or had diets that were low in fat have also been identified as being more likely to bear vitamin K deficient babies.‘

I’ve encountered parents who claim their children are vaccine-free but for the Vitamin K shot. Such is another clear misconception parents have to begin addressing. Your baby will normally acquire sufficient levels of Vitamin K via the placenta & colostrum; (typically within the first week after birth).

In the rare instance a mother is a carrier of the ‘hemophiliac gene’; where-in she possesses a damaged X chromosome which can be passed on to the child, her baby theoretically becomes vulnerable to Vitamin K deficiency, and in extreme cases, the potential for hemorrhaging. The female body, however, is designed to counter this very problem.

The point is, the undue risk of vaccines is routinely exaggerated without just cause, safe alternatives discouraged.

‘Every DNA molecules is composed of two strands. When a cell detects a DNA duplex with a difference between its two DNA strands, that duplex is “repaired” by the rather Draconian expedient of chopping out the entire region, on both strands of the DNA molecule. No effort is made by the cell to determine which strand is correct — both are discarded. The gap that this creates is filled by copying off the sequence present at that region on the other chromosome. All this editing happens when the two versions of the chromosome are paired closely together in the early stages of gamete (egg and sperm) formation, the process we biologists call meiosis.

‘All females have two copies of the “so-called” X chromosome. The X chromosome is about the same size as other 22 human chromosomes, which also occur in pairs, and like them is packed with some 1000 genes. The reason there are two copies of the X and other chromosome is to allow for the repair of the inevitable damage that occurs over time to individual genes because of wear-and-tear, chemical damage, and mistakes in copying. Because this sort of damage is passed on to offspring, it tends to accumulate over time. For this reason, genes must be edited every so often to repair the accumulated mutations (biologists call damage to genes mutation).‘

Doctors stubbornly adhere to this invasive procedure without any consideration of its traumatic nature on a newborn; typically lacking an overall holistic understanding of natural immunity. The Vitamin K shot, like that of Hepatitis B administered at 12 hours old, has its own inherent risks which place it in a similar tier & category to all other early shots given to babies. Just say, “No thank you!”

Try to always find the optimal organic source which contains the given Vitamin in it’s natural form, and ensure that it is pure, without derivatives or chemical and/or synthetic additives. As an example Kale contains the optimal balance of Vitamins A, C, E & K – a powerhouse of antioxidants. In the case of your baby you can puree the vegetable enough to ensure it is palatable. If you have no alternative then choose a supplement that is proven to be 100% natural & organic; but again natural is superior.

Additionally the mother’s placenta & breast milk (Colostrum) are inextricably linked, providing a baby’s primary initial source of nourishment through the long journey of formation in utero; while supplying the basic building blocks of life necessary to guarantee a safe transition into early childhood development. Mothers to be are advised to store up on phytonutrients while your baby is in utero. Continue nourishing the immune system especially during the 1st year after your child is born. Remember mothers, you share the same immunity with your baby during the entire in utero phase (all three trimesters), and for the many months after your baby is born, whilst breast-feeding!

‘Phytonutrients work as antioxidants to disarm free radicals before they can damage DNA and cell membranes. Recent research indicates that the phytonutrients in vegetables like kale work at a much deeper level, signaling our genes to increase production of enzymes involved in detoxification, the cleansing process by which the body eliminates harmful compounds.

Kale is a rich source of organosulfur compounds, which have been shown to reduce the risk of many cancers, especially one of the most deadly forms, colon cancer; due to their unique role in blocking the growth of cancer cells and inducing cancer cell death (apoptosis). Organosulfur compounds known as glucosinolates are present in the cruciferous vegetables of the Brassica genus. These compounds are broken down into potent anticancer compounds called isothiocyanates in the body, which are powerful inducers of cancer-destroying enzymes & inhibitors of carcinogenesis.’

Kale, Collard Greens, Mustard Greens and Turnip Greens are all cruciferous vegetables with deeply detoxifying properties. They cleanse and detoxify the liver, skin, digestive tract, lungs and reproductive organs.

They are high in calcium, vitamins C, A, E, (including Vitamin K), folate, B6 and zinc. Like broccoli, these greens are an important source of calcium because their vitamin C content significantly increases absorption.

In addition to its deep cellular cleansing properties, broccoli is high in vitamins C, K and A, all powerful antioxidants for supporting the immune system and detoxifying the skin cells. It is also noted for its calcium content, which is in a more available form than calcium from dairy. Calcium must bind with vitamin C to be fully absorbable, and broccoli provides a high dose of each.

Broccoli, cauliflower, cabbage and brussels sprouts are all edible flowers that cleanse the liver and reduce cancer of the colon, prostate, ovaries, lung and bladder. Combining broccoli with tomatoes is especially potent for protecting against prostate cancer. In addition, the broccoli and cauliflower leaves are also edible, containing more beta carotene (vitamin A) than the flower. Broccoli also contains lutein which protects the eyes and prevents cataracts.‘

‘The body does not readily utilise synthetic vitamins and minerals. The vitamin K administered by hospitals to newborns is the synthetic phytonadione. The natural forms of vitamin K that are found in many foods, particularly in vegetables such as collard greens, spinach, broccoli, asparagus, brussels sprouts and salad greens, are a different form – they are called phylloquinone or menaquinone. Certain bacteria in the intestinal tract also produce menaquinones.

Apart from its synthetic nature, it is based on plant Vitamin K and injected. The body utilises vitamins and minerals that are found in plants and creates the human form it needs, but this is after they go through the digestion process, which obviously does not occur with injections.‘

The Vitamin K shot has been linked to leukaemia, including acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, which is characterized by an increased number of white corpuscles in the blood, and accounts for about 85 percent of childhood leukaemia. Research carried out by Dr. Louise Parker, of the Sir James Spence Institute of Child Health in Newcastle upon Tyne, produced the most startling results. Dr. Louise Parker was quoted in the British Medical Journal in 1998 as stating, “It is not possible, on the basis of currently published evidence, to refute the suggestion that neonatal IM vitamin K administration increases the risk of early childhood leukemia.’

Vitamin K Vaccine: Package Insert

AquaMEPHYTON injection is a yellow, sterile, aqueous colloidal solution of vitamin K1, with a pH of 5.0 to 7.0, available for injection by the intravenous, intramuscular, and subcutaneous routes.

Each milliliter contains:
Phytonadione: 2 mg or 10 mg

Inactive ingredients:
Polyoxyethylated fatty acid derivative : 70 mg
Dextrose: 37.5 mg
Water for Injection, q.s: 1 mL
Added as preservative: Benzyl alcohol: 0.9%

Toxic effects of benzyl alcohol, including respiratory failure, vasodilation, hypotension, convulsions, and paralysis have been known for years. However, little is known about the toxic effects or levels of benzyl alcohol in neonates, especially in sick premature infants. Animal toxicity studies show an LD((50)) of approximately 33 ml/kg (300 mg/kg) in rats treated by rapid intravenous infusion with 0.9% benzyl alcohol, although 40 ml/kg (360 mg/kg) by slow intravenous infusion was tolerated without mortality.

Benzyl alcohol is normally oxidized rapidly to benzoic acid, conjugated with glycine in the liver, and excreted as hippuric acid. However, this metabolic pathway may not be well developed in premature infants. The benzyl alcohol may therefore have been metabolized to benzoic acid, which could not be conjugated by the immature liver but accumulated, causing metabolic acidosis.

Sixteen neonatal deaths thought to be caused by the benzyl alcohol preservative used in some intravascular solutions have been reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) by 2 medical centers. The deaths occurred in pre-term neonates weighing 2500 gms who had central intravascular catheters flushed periodically each day with bacteriostatic normal saline containing 9 mg/ml benzyl alcohol. Ten deaths occurred in 1 institution over a 6-month period and 6 deaths occurred in the other institution over a 16-month period. Investigators in the 2 hospitals have reported that similar deaths have not occurred since flush solutions without preservatives have been substituted for those with the benzyl alcohol.‘ CDC

The European Directive ‘Excipients in the Label and Package leaflet of Medicinal Products for Human Use‘ , states the following with respect to the parenteral use of benzyl alcohol:

‘Exposure to less than 90 mg/kg/day: Must not be given to premature babies or neonates. May cause toxic reactions and allergic reactions in infants and children up to 3 years old.

Exposure to more than 90 mg/kg/day: Must not be given to premature babies or neonates. due to the risk of fatal toxic reactions arising from exposure to benzyl alcohol in excess of 90 mg/kg/day, this product should not be used in infants and children up to 3 years old.’

Dr. Joesph Mercola Interviews Dr. Cees Vermeer on Vitamin K

List of Top 10 Foods Highest in Vitamin K

Thursday, August 4, 2016


Dear parents -- you know that cord blood they stole from your baby at birth? Well, the founder of Paypal wants to use it to create immortality.

Beware VAMPIRES masquerading as humans!!

"...If there’s one thing that really excites Thiel, it’s the prospect of having younger people’s blood transfused into his own veins..."

Source Article:
Paypal Founder Peter Thiel Is Pursuing Immortality With His Billions

Billionaire Peter Thiel believes it all: Singularity, Convergence, Transcendence and most importantly, Transhumanism. In other words, Thiel wants to become immortal and live forever, essentially becoming a god. He is spending his billions to achieve it. ⁃ TN Editor

More than anything, Peter Thiel, the billionaire technology investor and Donald Trump supporter, wants to find a way to escape death. He’s channeled millions of dollars into startups working on anti-aging medicine, spends considerable time and money researching therapies for his personal use, and believes society ought to open its mind to life-extension methods that sound weird or unsavory.

Speaking of weird and unsavory, if there’s one thing that really excites Thiel, it’s the prospect of having younger people’s blood transfused into his own veins.

That practice is known as parabiosis, and, according to Thiel, it’s a potential biological Fountain of Youth–the closest thing science has discovered to an anti-aging panacea. Research into parabiosis began in the 1950s with crude experiments that involved cutting rats open and stitching their circulatory systems together. After decades languishing on the fringes, it’s recently started getting attention from mainstream researchers, with multiple clinical trials underway in humans in the U.S. and even more advanced studies in China and Korea.

Considering the science-fiction promise of parabiosis, the studies have received notably little fanfare. But Thiel has been watching closely.
Thiel and Ambrosia.

In Monterey, California, about 120 miles from San Francisco, a company called Ambrosia recently commenced one of the trials. Titled “Young Donor Plasma Transfusion and Age-Related Biomarkers,” it has a simple protocol: Healthy participants aged 35 and older get a transfusion of blood plasma from donors under 25, and researchers monitor their blood over the next two years for molecular indicators of health and aging. The study is patient-funded; participants, who range in age from late 30s through 80s, must pay $8,000 to take part, and live in or travel to Monterey for treatments and follow-up assessments.

Ambrosia’s founder, the Stanford-trained physician Jesse Karmazin, has been studying aging for more than a decade. He became interested in launching a company around parabiosis after seeing impressive data from animals and studies conducted abroad in humans: In one trial after another, subjects experience a reversal of aging symptoms across every major organ system. While the mechanisms at play aren’t totally understood, he said, young organisms’ blood not only contains all sorts of proteins that improve cell function; somehow it also prompts the recipients’ body to increase its production of those proteins.

“The effects seem to be almost permanent,” he says. “It’s almost like there’s a resetting of gene expression.”

While Ambrosia advertised the study to attract participants, it didn’t seek broader coverage. So Karmazin was somewhat surprised to get a message from Jason Camm, chief medical officer at Thiel Capital, who expressed interest in what the company was doing. (Karmazin said he hasn’t reached out to any investors: “I’d really want to talk about what the business model would be.”)

Read Full Article Here


Pitocin is a biochemical weapon. It is designed to disrupt the natural birthing process and undermine the mother's ability to produce natural oxytocin. Oxytocin is the hormone of love and bonding. When this hormone (in its natural form) is absent during labor and birth, there will be a breakdown in mom's ability to love her child and she will likely have trouble breastfeeding.

In addition, Pitocin also stimulates extremely painful uterine contractions that are intense and unrelenting. These unnatural contractions often lead to fetal distress as the uterus is turned into a trash compactor and the baby's oxygen supply is choked off.

Pitocin can lead to uterine hyperstimulation and even uterine rupture. It is the main reason that at least 1/3 of all births in the U.S. end up with c-section and it is a major contributor to the neurological and behavioral issues we are seeing in children today.

Piticon is designed to cause trauma and brain damage in children. In fact, every hospital intervention during childbirth is designed to cause trauma and to attack the neurological integrity of the child as well as his/her psychological and spiritual development.

Hospitals are Luciferian temples of the occult. The rituals that take place within the walls of these evil places have wreaked havoc upon our species and caused an overwhelming breakdown in family love. This is intentional.

Below is an excerpt from my book, Birth Trauma and the Dark Side of Modern Medicine, followed by several articles of importance on this topic, including a long list of pitocin side effects.

"Pitocin is another drug that is used against label every day in the United States for the induction (and augmentation) of labor. Like Cytotec, Pitocin has not been approved by the FDA and, on the contrary, the FDA, along with the World Health Organization, and even The Physician’s Desk Reference warn against the use of Pitocin for the elective induction of labor...

The use of Pitocin to induce or augment labor can lead to a number of serious complications including uterine rupture, uterine hyperstimulation, postpartum hemorrhage, fetal distress, fetal asphyxia, fetal heart abnormalities, low APGAR scores, permanent central nervous system, brain damage, and death.

Despite the long list of serious complications caused by this drug, a 1992 University of Texas survey reveals that 81% of women in U.S. hospitals received Pitocin to induce or augment labor. “Pitocin inductions are a leading cause of C‑sections” and are one of the main reasons the U.S. has one of the highest C-section rates in the world.

“Pitocin is most often used to induce labor before it has begun naturally (its other use is to augment a labor that has already begun). When the body is not yet ready for the birthing process that it is being forced into, the result is often excessive maternal discomfort and fetal stress… Pitocin-induced contractions lack a slow build-up and are much stronger/harder, faster, and more frequent than normal. When uterine contractions are too hard and/or too long, uterine blood flow is reduced and the baby is deprived of oxygen. It’s important to remember that the baby experiences every contraction just as the mother does. Unnaturally strong and long contractions, produced by Pitocin, are quite difficult for the baby, not just painful for the mother. And while a mother opts for pain medication to numb her experience of the monster contractions, the baby does not experience pain relief. When the baby experiences the increased pain and decreases of optimal oxygen supply from these unnatural contractions, his heart rate is compromised, which prompts the diagnosis of “fetal distress,” and leads to the conclusion that a C‑section is “necessary” to “save” the baby. Of course, the OB is merely “saving” the baby from the unnecessary and dangerous complications that were caused by the administration of the induction drugs.”

Pitocin is artificial/synthetic oxytocin. Its use during labor tricks the mother’s brain and interferes with her ability to produce natural oxytocin. If natural oxytocin is not pumping through mom’s body during childbirth, her ability to bond with, breastfeed, and experience love for her baby is severely undermined. Not surprisingly, Pitocin use during labor disrupts bonding and breastfeeding and damages the newborn’s oxytocin receptor sites for life.

“Oxytocin is centrally related to our natural capacity to give birth. When we have a scheduled C-section, for example, there is no oxytocin release in the mother’s brain, and thus a severe interruption in the establishment of the postnatal oxytocin circuitry wiring in the newborn…

[A]fter just 3 or 4 generations of highly technological childbirth, it seems very possible that our human oxytocin system is weakening.”

What this means is that any infant born to a mother given this diabolical drug during the birth process can grow into a brain damaged adult that may become habitually depressed and have difficulty creating healthy relationships and/or experiencing human love throughout life. The use of this drug during labor is not only undermining the bonds of love between mother and child, but also the child’s potential to be happy later in life.

Furthermore, if we want to understand why so many people are becoming addicted to drugs like Oxycodone, we need only look to their damaged oxytocin receptor sites and recognize that these wounded souls are desperately trying to attain feelings of well‑being that should come naturally to them but do not because of the drugs they were exposed to early in life.

Incidentally, Pitocin and Oxycodone have very similar chemical formulas, with Oxycodone being made up of C18H21NO4 and Pitocin being made up of C43H66N12O12S2.  It would be an interesting study to find out how many Oxycodone addicts were born to mothers who were given Pitocin or some other version of synthetic oxytocin during birth.

Pitocin induction is now being associated with an increased chance for autism in children – especially in boys.

It is well known that Pitocin use in labor causes fetal distress. The reasons for this are many, but a primary problem with the use of Pitocin is that it creates a persistent stream of very intense contractions that turn the uterus into a trash compactor instead of a birthing vessel. For the mom, the unrelenting contractions quickly become unbearable and an epidural or some other form of pain relief is requested. For the baby, whose protective padding (i.e., the amniotic sac) has likely been forcefully broken by medical staff (through amniotomy or the “breaking of the waters”) and who is also likely to have an internal fetal heart monitor literally SCREWED INTO ITS HEAD (which probe pulls and tugs at the baby’s head with every contraction), Pitocin contractions are not only unbearably painful, but can quickly become life-threatening."

Source Article by Elaine Stillerman, LMT
The Truth About Pitocin

"There is a little publicly known law in New York (Public Health Law, Section 2503), passed in 1978, that requires all physicians and midwives to fully disclose and require informed consent from laboring women regarding the use of all drugs during labor and delivery.

Unfortunately, many care providers fail to tell their patients about the potential side-effects and possible risks involved in administering one of the most common drugs used during labor, pitocin. Pitocin is a synthetic form of oxytocin, the natural hormone that stimulates the onset of labor, promotes a sense of well-being and enhances maternal bonding, given to women to induce or augment labor. It's manufactured from the pituitary extract of various animals, and combined with acetic acid for pH adjustment and less than one percent of chloretone as a preservative.

The routine use of pitocin is not backed by any scientific data, and the side-effects of pitocin during labor (and sometimes during the third stage of labor to assist the expulsion of the placenta) rarely are discussed with the laboring woman. Regardless of how many labors are induced with pitocin, most of them are not medically necessary.

During the 1980s, Dr. Roberto Caldreyo-Barcia, a former president of the International Federation of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and a renowned researcher into the effects of obstetrical interventions commented, "Pitocin is the most abused drug in the world today." He claimed its use was medically necessary in only about 3% of labors, yet estimates of its use range from 12% to 60%. Often, the drug is administered without the woman's knowledge and she never is told of its potential harmful risk factors.

The Physician's Desk Reference supports the use of pitocin only when medically necessary and advises to begin with a minimum dosage to see how the laboring mother tolerates it. The mother should receive oxygen and continuous electronic fetal monitoring, since fetal distress is more common with pitocin use and needs to be carefully watched.

The natural rhythm of labor is supported by the release of oxytocin in bursts as needed, whereas pitocin is administered as a constant IV drip that confines most women to bed. This decreases their ability to control the escalating pain caused by drug-induced uterine activity, and laboring women are more likely to require pain medication that slows labor. Think of the dichotomy: pitocin is administered to speed up labor, but the increased level of pain requires medication that slows it down. In addition, pitocin often has no effect on cervical dilation even though the contractions are much stronger.

Pitocin might cause a tumultuous, difficult labor and tetanic contractions, rupture of the uterus and dehiscence of a uterine scar, lacerations of the cervix, retained placenta or postpartum hemorrhage. Postpartum perineal and pelvic floor pain is increased as a result of augmented uterine contractions. Fetal complications might include fetal asphyxia and neonatal hypoxia, physical injury and neonatal jaundice. The use of pitocin also might be a factor in cerebral palsy from deprived oxygen and autism.

Dr. Eric Hollander of Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York presented a theory at a 1996 annual meeting of the American Psychiatric Association that linked autism with pitocin-induced labors. He put forward the idea that pitocin interferes with the newborn's oxytocin system that results in the social disabilities of autism. When he gave autistic children oxytocin, it made them four times more talkative and twice as happy, although some patients did not respond.

(Author's note: consider how the heightened, augmented uterine contractions might impact the soft fetal cranium and its possible injurious affect on the cranio-sacral system.)

Pitocin was first synthesized in 1953, and became available for use two years later. By 1974, it was an established medical fact that its failure rate was 40% to 50%. In 1978, an FDA advisory committee removed its approval of pitocin for the elective induction of labor. Interestingly, the drug never was approved by the FDA for use in augmenting labor.

While not all women and their babies are harmed by the use of pitocin, there are natural ways to coax labor that are rather effective and have no potential risks. Orgasms cause the release of oxytocin that might initiate the onset of labor in late pregnancy. Sex always has been a recognized method of starting labor. Sperm contains prostaglandins that encourage the cervix to ripen. Spicy foods, long walks, nipple stimulation, certain herbs such as blue cohosh (Excessive amounts of blue cohosh might raise maternal blood pressure to dangerous levels and might have an overdosing effect on the baby. A naturopath or herbalist should be consulted before recommending this or any herb to your pregnant clients), the use of castor oil, acupuncture, massage and general relaxation techniques might all be effective in initiating labor without the harmful side-effects of pitocin.

Labor is a complex physiological function that begins with the harmonious synchronicity of the fetus, mother and placenta. Any intervention of these essential participants offsets the balance and rhythm of labor. Babies, like fruit, ripen in their own time. The best way to promote a healthy pregnancy, labor and birth is to let the forces of nature work at their own pace.


ACOG, "Induction of Labor," ACOG Technical Bulletin 217, Dec. 1995.
AJOG, "Elective Induction v Spontaneous Labor: A Retrospective Study of Complications and Outcomes," 1992.
Goer, Henci, Obstetric Myths v Research Realities, Westport: CT, Bergin and Garvey, 1995.
Griffin, Nancy, "Let the Baby Decide: The Case Against Inducing Labor - Use of the Drug Pitocin is Questioned," Mothering Magazine, 2001.
ICEA, "Induction of Labor in Postterm Pregnancy," ICEA Review 12:1, 1988.
Inch, Sally, Birth Rights, New York: Pantheon, 1984.
JAMA Statistical Bulletin, January 21, 1998.
"Life in a Parallel World: A Bold New Approach to the Mystery of Autism" Newsweek, May 13, 1996.
Korte, Diana and Scaer, Roberta, A Good Birth, A Safe Birth, New York: Bantam, 1984."

Source Article:
Pitocin’s untold impact

Michel Odent, MD, founder of the Primal Health Research Centre, has spent decades studying the “primal period.” Odent defines the primal period—prenatal, birth, and the first year of life—as the time “when the basic adaptive systems—those involved in what we commonly call health—reach their maturity” (Source). Today’s Midwifery Today E-News shared a quote from Odent about synthetic oxytocin [Pitocin] and the potentially detrimental impact it can have on a fetus’s oxytocin receptors. Here’s an excerpt:

80% of the blood reaching the fetus via the umbilical vein goes directly to the inferior vena cava via the ductus venosus, bypassing the liver, and therefore immediately reaching the brain: it is all the more direct since the shunts (foramen ovale and ductus arteriosus) are not yet closed. . . . Furthermore, it appears that the permeability of the blood-brain barrier can increase in situations of oxidative stress—a situation that is common when drips of synthetic oxytocin are used during labor. We have, therefore, serious reasons to be concerned if we take into account the widely documented concept of “oxytocin-induced desensitization of the oxytocin receptors.” In other words, it is probable that, at a quasi-global level, we routinely interfere with the development of the oxytocin system of human beings at a critical phase for gene-environment interaction.

Oxytocin is the hormone of love and bonding and human connection. If the oxytocin system is damaged, or a child’s oxytocin receptors become desensitized, the ramifications are huge. As more and more scientists study oxytocin’s impact, we can see how crucial our body’s oxytocin systems can be for human life, love, and happiness.

Animal research suggests that oxytocin is one of our mind and body’s best defenses against stress, anxiety, and depression:

In a study presented at the 2007 Society for Neuroscience meeting, Grippo, Porges and Carter compared the stress reactions of female prairie voles living for four weeks either in isolation or with a female sibling and found greater levels of stress, behavioral anxiety and depression in those separated from their siblings. The team then gave the animals either oxytocin or saline every day during the last two weeks of the four-week period. The isolated animals treated with oxytocin no longer showed signs of depression, anxiety or cardiac stress. By contrast, oxytocin had no measurable effects on those paired with siblings, suggesting that “the effects of oxytocin are most apparent under stressful conditions,” Carter says. (Tori DeAngelis, “The two faces of oxytocin“)

If Michel Odent is right about prolonged Pitocin exposure desensitizing a fetus’s oxytocin receptors, then it’s possible that these children will grow up with impaired abilities to cope with stress, leading to higher rates of depression and anxiety.

Other research indicates that induction (and cesarean births) may lead to a higher incidence of autism:

A 2004 study out of Australia found that autistic children were twice as likely to have been born without natural labor, either by elective cesarean or induction. (Jennifer Block, Pushed, p. 139)

And that oxytocin administration benefits autistic individuals:

[P]sychiatrist Eric Hollander, MD, of Mount Sinai School of Medicine, and colleagues found that adults diagnosed with autism or Asperger’s disorder who received oxytocin injections showed an improved ability to identify emotional content on a speech comprehension task, while those on a placebo did not. (Tori DeAngelis, “The two faces of oxytocin“)

There are implications for drug addiction as well:

In rats, intravenous self-administration of heroin was potently decreased by [oxytocin] treatment. . . . [Oxytocin] receptors in the [central nervous system]–mainly those located in limbic and basal forebrain structures–are responsible for mediating various effects of [oxytocin] in the opiate- and cocaine-addicted organism. (Kovacs GL, Sarnyai Z, Szabo G, Oxytocin and addiction: a review)

Someone close to me was on Prozac several years ago. He told me that, while it reduced his depression, it also reduced his ability to feel any and all emotions. He felt nothing. Empty. From what I understand, his experience is not uncommon. Perhaps it’s because Prozac (fluoxetine) seems to “inhibit the action of oxytocin” (Cantor JM, Binik YM, Pfaus JG, Chronic fluoxetine inhibits sexual behavior in the male rat: reversal with oxytocin). Could that empty emotional void be what it feels like to live as a child whose oxytocin receptors were damaged at birth?

And I haven’t even touched yet on the other potential negative effects of Pitocin. All this from a drug used daily to induce labor for doctor or patient convenience (a use for which it has not been approved by the FDA) and far too often for less-than-concrete “medical” reasons. Jennifer Block shared these eye-opening statements in Pushed:

A recent ACOG survey found that in 43% of malpractice suits involving neurologically impaired babies, Pitocin was to blame. (p. 137)

Even Williams Obstetrics offers a sobering history: “Oxytocin is a powerful drug, and it has killed or maimed mothers through rupture of the uterus and even more babies through hypoxia from markedly hypertonic uterine contractions.” (p. 138)

The truth is that we really don’t know all the ways synthetic oxytocin might be affecting our children (or ourselves as mothers). There are certainly situations where Pitocin use is warranted and acceptable, but those cases are far less common than current use would suggest. Without a doubt our society has a Pitocin abuse problem. How many women do you know who have been given Pitocin? How many of them do you think are aware of the potential problems associated with that drug? I have a feeling that future generations, after further inquiry and research, will end the rampant use of Pitocin (and the atrocious practice of “Pit to distress,” see here and here). But I fear what damage may be done in the meantime."

Source Article:
Pitocin Side Effects

As well as its needed effects, oxytocin (the active ingredient contained in Pitocin) may cause unwanted side effects that require medical attention.

If any of the following side effects occur while taking oxytocin, check with your doctor or nurse immediately:


convulsions (seizures)
difficulty in breathing
fast or irregular heartbeat
headache (continuing or severe)
pelvic or abdominal pain (severe)
skin rash or itching
vaginal bleeding (increased or continuing)
weight gain (rapid)
Incidence not known:
Abdominal pain or cramping
blood clotting problem that causes prolonged bleeding
chest pain or discomfort
difficulty swallowing
extra heartbeats
pounding or rapid pulse
puffiness or swelling of the eyelids or around the eyes, face, lips, or tongue
severe bleeding after giving birth
shortness of breath
tightness in the chest
unusual tiredness or weakness

If any of the following symptoms of overdose occur while taking oxytocin, get emergency help immediately:

Symptoms of overdose:

slow to respond
slurred speech

Severity: Minor

Some oxytocin side effects may not need any medical attention. As your body gets used to the medicine these side effects may disappear. Your health care professional may be able to help you prevent or reduce these side effects, but do check with them if any of the following side effects continue, or if you are concerned about them:


For Healthcare Professionals
Applies to oxytocin: compounding powder, injectable solution

Cardiovascular side effects have included hypertension, premature ventricular contractions, sinus tachycardia, and other cardiac arrhythmias. Neonatal bradycardia, premature ventricular contractions and other arrhythmias have been reported.[Ref]

Nervous system
Nervous system side effects have included mania-like disturbances and seizures. The seizures may have been related to water intoxication. Neonatal seizures and permanent CNS or brain damage has been reported.[Ref]

Metabolic side effects have included water intoxication resulting in coma and seizures.[Ref]

Hypersensitivity side effects have included anaphylactic reactions.[Ref]

Genitourinary side effects have included pelvic hematoma. Excessive doses have produced pelvic fracture, uterine hypertonicity, spasm, tetanic contraction and rupture.[Ref]

Hematologic side effects have included postpartum hemorrhage and fatal afibrinogenemia.[Ref]


Hepatic side effects have included neonatal jaundice.[Ref]

Gastrointestinal side effects have included nausea and vomiting.[Ref]

Respiratory side effects have included pulmonary edema.[Ref]

Renal side effects have included decreases in glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow. Doses of 40 milliunits per minute may produce significant decreases in urine output.[Ref]

Local side effects have included nasal irritation and rhinorrhea.[Ref]

Ocular side effects have included neonatal retinal hemorrhages.[Ref]

Psychiatric side effects have included memory impairment and mania in patients on high doses.[Ref]


General side effects have include low Apgar scores at 5 minutes. Fetal death has been reported.[Ref]

1. Evron S Ariely S Agasi M Eger G Bukovsky I Caspi E "Severe peripheral arteriospasm following oxytocin administration." Am J Obstet Gynecol 155 (1986): 657-8

2. Lazo JS, Sebti SM "Bleomycin." Cancer Chemother Biol Response Modif 15 (1994): 44-50

3. "Product Information. Syntocinon (oxytocin)." Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ.

4. Hendricks CH Brenner WE "Cardiovascular effects of oxytocic drugs used post partum." Am J Obstet Gynecol 108 (1970): 751-60

5. Nakano J "Cardiovascular actions of oxytocin." Obstet Gynecol Surv 28 (1973): 75-92

6. "Product Information. Pitocin (oxytocin)." Pfizer U.S. Pharmaceuticals Group, New York, NY.

7. Plumer MH "Letter: Oxytocin-induced venous spasm?" Anesthesiology 44 (1976): 87-8

8. Dawood MY "Pharmacologic stimulation of uterine contraction." Semin Perinatol 19 (1995): 73-83

9. Johnstone M "The cardiovascular effects of oxytocic drugs." Br J Anaesth 44 (1972): 826-34

10. Schwartz RH Jones RW "Transplacental hyponatraemia due to oxytocin." Br Med J 1 (1978): 152-3

11. Goodlin RC "Oxytocin may explain neonatal seizures" Am J Obstet Gynecol 161 (1989): 259

12. Pedlow PR "Syntocinon induced convulsion." J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 77 (1970): 1113-4

13. Muller FJ Van Zyl-Smit R "Oxytocin-induced water intoxication. A case report." S Afr Med J 68 (1985): 340-1

14. Mwambingu FT "Water intoxication and oxytocin." Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 290 (1985): 113

15. D'Souza SW Lieberman B Cadman J Richards B "Oxytocin induction of labour: hyponatraemia and neonatal jaundice." Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 22 (1986): 309-17

16. Jensen I Bruns BJ "Water intoxication after oxytocin-induced midtrimester abortion." N Z Med J 89 (1979): 300-2

17. Ansseau M Legros JJ Mormont C Cerfontaine JL Papart P Geenen V Adam F Franck G "Intranasal oxytocin in obsessive-compulsive disorder." Psychoneuroendocrinology 12 (1987): 231-6

18. Slater RM Bowles BJ Pumphrey RS "Anaphylactoid reaction to oxytocin in pregnancy." Anaesthesia 40 (1985): 655-6

19. Morriss WW, Lavies NG, Anderson SK, Southgate HJ "Acute respiratory distress during caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. A probable case of anaphylactoid reaction to Syntocinon." Anaesthesia 49 (1994): 41-3

20. Maycock EJ, Russell WC "Anaphylactoid reaction to Syntocinon." Anaesth Intensive Care 21 (1993): 211-2

21. Kawarabayashi T Narisawa Y Nakamura K Sugimori H Oda M Taniguchi Y "Anaphylactoid reaction to oxytocin during cesarean section." Gynecol Obstet Invest 25 (1988): 277-9

22. Spears FD, Liu DW "Anaphylactoid reaction to syntocinon?." Anaesthesia 49 (1994): 550-1

23. Taylor RW Taylor M "Misuse of oxytocin in labour" Lancet 1 (1988): 352

24. Wiener JJ Evans AS "Uterine rupture in midtrimester abortion. A complication of gemeprost vaginal pessaries and oxytocin. Case report" Br J Obstet Gynaecol 97 (1990): 1061-2

25. Sweeten KM, Graves WK, Athanassiou A "Spontaneous rupture of the unscarred uterus." Am J Obstet Gynecol 172 (1995): 1851-5;disc. 1855-6

26. Leventhal JM Reid DE "Oxytocin-induced water intoxication with grand mal convulsion." Am J Obstet Gynecol 102 (1968): 310-1

27. Robichaux WH, Perper JA "Massive perinatal hepatic necrosis from maternal oxytocin overdose." Pediatr Pathol 12 (1992): 761-5

28. Connor BH Seaton PG "Birth weight, and use of oxytocin and analgesic agents in labour in relation to neonatal jaundice." Med J Aust 2 (1982): 466-9

29. Dwyer N "Managing the third stage of labour. Nausea is a fair price for preventing haemorrhage." BMJ 308 (1994): 59

30. Munsick RA "Renal hemodynamic effects of oxytocin in antepartal and postpartal women." Am J Obstet Gynecol 108 (1970): 729-39

31. Kennett DJ Devlin MC Ferrier BM "Influence of oxytocin on human memory processes: validation by a control study." Life Sci 31 (1982): 273-5

32. Cordano A Kraus V "Clinical experience with oxytocin." Obstet Gynecol 39 (1972): 247-53

33. Beck LR Flowers CE Jr Blair WD "The effects of oxytocin on fetal scalp temperature." Obstet Gynecol 53 (1979): 200-2

It is possible that some side effects of Pitocin may not have been reported. These can be reported to the FDA here. Always consult a healthcare professional for medical advice.